For the Messenger and Advocate.
Brother O[liver] Cowdery:
Dear Sir—This place having recently been visited by a gentleman who advocated the prin ciples or doctrines of those who are called abolitionists; if you deem the following reflections of any service, or think they will have a tendency to correct the opinions of the southern public, relative to the views and senti ments I believe, as an individual, and am able to say, from personal knowl edge, are the feelings of others, you are at liberty to give them publicity in the columns of the Advocate. I am prompted to this course in conse quence, in one respect, of many el ders having gone into the Southern States, besides, there now being many in that country who have already em braced the fulness of the gospel, as re vealed through the book of Mormon,— having learned, by experience, that the enemy of truth does not slumber, nor cease his exertions to bias the minds of communities against the ser vants of the Lord, by stiring up the in dignation of men upon all matters of importance or interest.
Thinking, perhaps, that the sound might go out, that “an abolitionist” had held forth several times to this community, and that the public feeling was not aroused to create mobs or dis turbances, leaving the impression that all he said was concurred in, and re ceived as gospel and the word of sal vation. I am happy to say, that no violence or breach of the public peace was attempted, so far from this, that all except a very few, attended to their own avocations and left the gentleman to hold forth his own arguments to nearly naked walls.
I am aware, that many who profess to preach the gospel, complain against their brethren of the same faith, who reside in the south, and are ready to withdraw the hand of fellowship be cause they will not renounce the prin ciple of slavery and raise their voice against every thing of the kind. This must be a tender point, and one which should call forth the candid reflection of all men, and especially before they advance in an opposition calculated to lay waste the fair States of the South, and set loose, upon the world a com munity of people who might peradven ture, overrun our country and violate the most sacred principles of human society,—chastity and virtue.
No one will pretend to say, that the people of the free states are as capa ble of knowing the evils of slavery as those who hold them. If slavery is an evil, who, could we expect, would first learn it? Would the people of the free states, or would the slave states? All must readily admit, that th[e] latter would first learn this fact. If the fact was learned first by those immediately concerned, who would be more capa ble than they of prescribing a remedy?
And besides, are not those who hold slaves, persons of ability, discernment and candor? Do they not expect to give an account at the bar of God for their conduct in this life? It may, no doubt, with propriety be said, that ma ny who hold slaves live without the fear of God before their eyes, and, the same may be said of many in the free states. Then who is to be the judge in this matter?
So long, then, as those of the free states are not interested in the free dom of the slaves, any other than upon the mere principles of equal rights and of the gospel, and are ready to admit that there are men of piety who re side in the South, who are immediate ly concerned, and until they complain, and ca[l]l for assistance, why not cease their clamor, and no further urge the slave to acts of murder, and the master to vigorous discipline, rendering both miserable, and unprepared to pursue that course which might otherwise lead them both to better their condi tion? I do not believe that the people of the North have any more right to say that the South shall not hold slaves, than the South have to say the North shall.
And further, what benefit will it ev er be to the slave for persons to run over the free states, and excite indig nation against their masters in the minds of thousands and tens of thou sands who understand nothing relative [p. [289]]