allowed the privilege of introducing his witnesses, he could have disproved every thing that was against him: but the Court suffered them to be intimidated some of them <in> the presence of the Court, and they were driven also and hunted and some of them entirely driven out of the , And thus he was not able to have a fair trial; That the Spirit of the Court was tyrranical and overbearing, and the whole transaction of his treatment convinced your petitioners that it was a religious persecution, proscribing <him> in the liberty of Conscience which is guaranteed to him by the Constitution of the , and the State of . That a long catalogue of garbled testimony was permitted by the court, purporting to be the religious senti ments of the Said Joseph Smith Jr which testimony was false, and your petitioners know that it was false, and can prove that it was false because the witnesses testified that those sentiments were promulgated on certain days and in the presence of large congregations, and your petit ioners can prove by those congregations that the said Joseph Smith Jr did not promulgate such ridiculous and absurd sentiments for his religion as was testified of, and admitted before the Honorable and at the same time these things had no bearing on the case that the said Joseph Smith Jr was pretended to be charged with.
And after the examination the said prisoner was committed to the jail for treason against the State of . whereas the said Joseph Smith Jr did not levy war against the State of , neither did he commit any overt acts, neither did he aid or abet an enemy against the State of during the time that he is charged with having done so, and further your petitioners have yet to learn that the has an enemy, neither is the proof evident nor the presumption great in its most malignant form upon the face of the testimony on the part of the , expartie as it is in its nature that the said prisoner had committed the slightest degree of treason or any other act of transgression against the laws of the State of ; and yet said prisoner has been committed to Liberty Jail Clay County (Mo) for treason, he has continually offered bail to any amount that could be required, notwithstanding your petitioners alledge that he ought to have been acquitted. Your petitioners also alledge that the commitment was an illegal commitment, for the law requires that a copy of the testimony should be put in the hands of the Jailor which was not done. Your petitioners alledge that the prisoner has been denied the privilege of the law, in a writ of Habeas Corpus, by the Judges of this ; whether they have prejudged the case of the prisoner or whether they are not willing to administer law and justice to the prisoner, or that they are intimitdated by the high office of who only acted in the case of the prisoners as a committing Magistrate, a conservator [p. 22]