The Papers
Browse the PapersDocumentsJournalsAdministrative RecordsRevelations and TranslationsHistoriesLegal RecordsFinancial RecordsOther Contemporary Papers
Reference
PeoplePlacesEventsGlossaryLegal GlossaryFinancial GlossaryCalendar of DocumentsWorks CitedFeatured TopicsLesson PlansRelated Publications
Media
VideosPhotographsIllustrationsChartsMapsPodcasts
News
Current NewsArchiveNewsletterSubscribeJSP Conferences
About
About the ProjectJoseph Smith and His PapersFAQAwardsEndorsementsReviewsEditorial MethodNote on TranscriptionsNote on Images of People and PlacesReferencing the ProjectCiting This WebsiteProject TeamContact Us
Published Volumes
  1. Home > 
  2. The Papers > 

Plat of the City of Zion, circa Early June–25 June 1833

Cardinal Directions Page 1 Three Center Blocks Page 1

Source Note

Plat and Explanation of Plat of the , [, Geauga Co., OH], ca. early June–25 June 1833; text and drawings in handwriting of ; one page; CHL.
One leaf measuring approximately 16⅛ × 12¾ inches (41 × 32 cm). The leaf contains a drawing of a plat in the center of the recto and text explaining the plat on the recto and on the verso. Some explanatory text is lost because of three substantial tears along the document’s edges. The drawing of the plat measures 9¼ × 8⅞ inches (24 × 23 cm). The plat is drawn in ink and colored with watercolor. The three central blocks are painted a faint sienna red, and the streets are painted a light green. Some graphite markings are visible on the plat, indicating that may have originally sketched the lines of the plat in pencil before using a pen to finalize the drawing. The document was folded multiple times and, along with the plan of the , was enclosed in a letter dated 25 June 1833 and sent to , Missouri. It is unknown how or when the Church Historian’s Office obtained this document, though it is possible that it, like the plan of the House of the Lord, was given to the Historian’s Office in June 1865 by Lydia Partridge.

Footnotes

  1. [1]

    Plan of the House of the Lord, between 1 and 25 June 1833; Letter to Church Leaders in Jackson Co., MO, 25 June 1833.

  2. [2]

    See Source Note for Plan of the House of the Lord, between 1 and 25 June 1833.

Historical Introduction

By the summer of 1831, JS and other leaders in the believed that , which was designated to be built in , Missouri, would become a central gathering place and the archetype for a “City of holyness,” where all believers would live together in righteousness. By mid-1833, church leaders in had acquired a large amount of land in Jackson County, where according to one estimate, more than twelve hundred church members lived. Meanwhile in , church leaders made plans to obtain funds and materials to build a , or temple, in . However, little headway was made until a 1 June 1833 revelation chastened leaders for their lack of progress, which encouraged them to begin constructing the house. Perhaps being influenced by their plans to develop Kirtland as a town and a gathering place, the likewise began contemplating the growth in and the gathering to Missouri and as a result created the plat featured here and its accompanying explanation. They then sent the plat to Missouri church leaders with a letter and an architectural plan for a to be built in . The letter that accompanied this plat indicates that the entire presidency was involved in creating it, though the drawing of the plat and its explanation are in the hand of . The plat of the “” featured here represents the first detailed master plan for city development by the church’s .
The plat is drawn with the east-oriented side at the top. It displays a one-square-mile grid with forty-nine city blocks and 132-foot-wide straight streets crossing at right angles. The square-mile grid pattern adhered to guidelines set out in the federal Land Ordinance of 1785 and was common in urban planning during this period of American history. The plat and the explanation written in the margins surrounding it, however, called for some distinctive elements. For instance, the plat featured fewer blocks than would have been normal for a square-mile section of a township. The explanation also called for ten-acre city blocks containing lots that, at half an acre each, were larger than usual. The explanation also called for a central row of blocks to contain fifteen acres each. As drawn, however, the plat has a middle row of seven blocks that contain sixteen acres each. Forty-six of the blocks on the plat were designated as residential areas, and the three central blocks were intended for storehouses and temples. The residential blocks featured an unusual arrangement of individual lots: each half-acre lot was to contain one house, generally positioned on each block so as to not face the house across the street. The instructions stated that each house should be set back twenty-five feet from the street and be made of brick and stone. The explanation also indicated that the city was intended to accommodate fifteen to twenty thousand people. However, the plat features only 976 residential lots, which means that more than fifteen individuals would have needed to live in each house in order to accommodate a minimum of fifteen thousand people. When the city reached the population limit, according to the explanation, another city would be established after this same pattern.
The plat and its explanation depicted an urban-agrarian center designed for equitable distribution of property, community cohesion, and convenient access to schoolhouses, places for congregational worship, and nearby agricultural land that was to support the urban population. The explanation of the plat indicated that all individuals living in the were to reside in the urban center, even if they worked on a farm. The presidency explained that all farms, grazing areas, and agricultural structures were to be built outside the city’s perimeter, forming a hinterland and greenbelt. The plat did not indicate where businesses were to be built, suggesting they might also be located outside of the city, or perhaps they were to be connected to residential lots or located on one of the central blocks within the .
The three larger blocks in the center of the plat contained a complex of twenty-four multipurpose buildings, or , which were to dominate the urban landscape. The presence of these buildings, and the apparent exclusion of other types of buildings, highlights the role of religion in the city. Though these “houses,” or temples, may have also been intended to serve as locations where people could perform the municipal functions of law and order, the names given in the explanation of the city plat for these twenty-four buildings reflect the structure of the church. This sacred space was the city’s focal point; much of daily life was meant to revolve around these buildings, which would likely be used for church administration, ecclesiastical worship, and priesthood education. Two years earlier, during a visit to in summer 1831, JS and seven other church leaders had “assembled together where the is to be erected.” dedicated the ground for the city and JS laid a cornerstone for the “contemplated Temple” on 3 August 1831. Rigdon then “pronounced this Spot of ground wholy dedicated unto the Lord forever.” The plat may have been designed with that “spot of ground” as its center.
Along with this plat, an architectural plan for the first to be built in accompanied the letter to church leaders in . That plan also gave specifications, dimensions, and names for the twenty-four temples to be constructed in the city center. The leaders wrote that they desired “with all our hearts, the prosperity of Zion and the peace of her inhabitents for we have as great an intrest in the welfare of Zion.” For this reason, they sent the plat, explanations, and plans. They instructed that the temple identified on the plat by an “x” was “to be built immediately in Zion for the presidency as well as all purposes of Religion and instruction,” much like the multipurpose structure then being built in Kirtland. Underscoring the importance of the plans and explanations sent, JS and the Kirtland leadership informed the recipients in that if they did not understand the explanations for the house or the plat, “you will inform us, so as you may have a propper understanding, for it is meet that all things should be done according to the pattern.”
The body of text titled “Explanation” was written on all four margins surrounding the plat and is included in the following transcript. The text begins in the top margin (the east-oriented side) of the plat, continues on the bottom, and then proceeds on the right-hand margin before moving to the left-hand margin of the plat. The explanation concludes on the reverse side of the document by identifying the names of the twenty-four temples. copied the names for the temples into Minute Book 1 on 24 June 1833, which suggests that at least that portion of the explanation on the plat had been created by that date, though additions may have been made before the draft was sent to two days later. Likely on 25 June 1833, the day before the plat was mailed to Missouri, Frederick G. Williams copied the explanations of the plat into JS Letterbook 1. acknowledged that this plat and the building “plan of our Lord” arrived in on 29 July 1833.
Attempts to implement the plan of would have necessitated major changes in existing roads and structures and undoubtedly caused significant political strife. The plat appears to disregard existing streets, structures, and, consequently, anyone already living or operating a farm or business at this location who might not accede to this plan. Though this plat had not yet reached , opponents of the church claimed to have heard church members “declare openly that their God has given them this County of land, and that sooner or later they must and will have the possession of our lands for an inheritance.” Such sentiments angered many local residents and further motivated them to expel the Mormons. The plat of the , had it been seen by the church’s opponents, could have confirmed what they already believed about the ’s goals in the county. By the time this plat was received in Missouri, church members were already embroiled in a growing civil conflict with other residents of Jackson County and therefore could not implement the plans. Based on letters from Missouri and noticeable defects in the plan, , again on behalf of the presidency of the high priesthood, drew a revised plat map for the city of Zion and sent it to Missouri about two months later.
The images of the document shown here are oriented east-side up, as was the original document.

Footnotes

  1. [1]

    Revelation, 20 July 1831 [D&C 57:1–3]; Old Testament Revision 1, p. 16 [Moses 7:19].

  2. [2]

    “The Elders Stationed in Zion to the Churches Abroad,” The Evening and the Morning Star, July 1833, 110–111.

    The Evening and the Morning Star. Independence, MO, June 1832–July 1833; Kirtland, OH, Dec. 1833–Sept. 1834.

  3. [3]

    See Minutes, 4 May 1833; Revelation, 1 June 1833 [D&C 95]; and Minutes, ca. 1 June 1833.

  4. [4]

    Letter to Church Leaders in Jackson Co., MO, 25 June 1833; Plan of the House of the Lord, between 1 and 25 June 1833.

  5. [5]

    Portions of the accompanying letter that refer to the plat are written in the first-person plural, which also suggests that the entire presidency participated in creating this plan for the city of Zion. (See Letter to Church Leaders in Jackson Co., MO, 25 June 1833.)

  6. [6]

    According to historical geographer Richard H. Jackson, Philadelphia was an early example of a planned city that incorporated some of the same features as the plan for the city of Zion. Jackson also demonstrates that the plan for Zion, particularly its street width, is similar to the layout of several towns in Ohio with which JS was likely familiar, including Fremont, which was founded in 1816 and had 132-foot-wide streets, and Sandusky, which was founded in 1830 and had 125-foot-wide streets. (Jackson, “Mormon Village: Genesis and Antecedents of the City of Zion Plan,” 224–227; see also Reps, Making of Urban America, 172–174, 466–472.)

    Jackson, Richard H. “The Mormon Village: Genesis and Antecedents of the City of Zion Plan.” BYU Studies 17, no. 2 (Winter 1977): 223–240.

    Reps, John W. The Making of Urban America: A History of City Planning in the United States. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1965.

  7. [7]

    In his study of urban America, John W. Reps argues that the arrangement or division of residential lots on the plat of the city of Zion was unusual in comparison to other drawn plats at this time. (Reps, Making of Urban America, 466–468.)

    Reps, John W. The Making of Urban America: A History of City Planning in the United States. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1965.

  8. [8]

    According to JS’s journal, it was “the duty of the bretheren to come into Cities to build and live and Carry on their farms out, of the City . . . according to the order of God.” (JS, Journal, 6 Aug. 1838.)

  9. [9]

    Whitmer, History, 32, underlining in original; see also Revelation, 1 Aug. 1831 [D&C 58:57].

  10. [10]

    Plan of the House of the Lord, between 1 and 25 June 1833.

  11. [11]

    Letter to Church Leaders in Jackson Co., MO, 25 June 1833.

  12. [12]

    Letter from John Whitmer, 29 July 1833.

  13. [13]

    Letter from John Whitmer, 29 July 1833; see also “To His Excellency, Daniel Dunklin,” The Evening and the Morning Star, Dec. 1833, 114–115.

    The Evening and the Morning Star. Independence, MO, June 1832–July 1833; Kirtland, OH, Dec. 1833–Sept. 1834.

  14. [14]

    Revised Plat of the City of Zion, ca. Early Aug. 1833.

Asterisk (*) denotes a "featured" version, which includes an introduction and annotation. *Plat of the City of Zion, circa Early June–25 June 1833 Letterbook 1 Minute Book 1 History, 1838–1856, volume A-1 [23 December 1805–30 August 1834] “History of Joseph Smith”

Page [2]

The names of the temples to be built on [the pa]inted squares Nos. 7-8-9 <​10-11-12​> are to be called the house of the Lord for the after the order of Melchisedeck which was after the order of the Son of <​God​> upon Mount Zion City of the New Jerusalem Nos. 7-8-9 The Sacred Apostolical repository for the use of the Nos. 4-5-6 The holy Evangelical house for the of the holy order of God Nos— 1-2-3 The house of the Lord for the of an ensign to the nations Nos 22-23-24 house of the Lord for the presidency of the high priesthood after the order of Aron, a standard for the people Nos. 19-20-21- house of the Lord<​*​> the law of the Kingdom of heaven and Messenger to the people <​*​> for the priesthood high priesthood after the order of Aron) Nos.—16-17-18 house of the Lord for the in Zion Messenger to the church Nos. 13-14-15 house of the Lord for the in Zion helps in goverment underneath must be written on each house holiness to the Lord
NB. the Stars are to have the sentences placed to gether having committed an error in writing the sentence “for the high priesthood after the order of Aron[”] should be placed immediately after the house of the Lord. [p. [2]]
View entire transcript

|

Cite this page

Source Note

Document Transcript

Page [2]

Document Information

Related Case Documents
Editorial Title
Plat of the City of Zion, circa Early June–25 June 1833
ID #
3503
Total Pages
2
Print Volume Location
JSP, D3:121–131
Handwriting on This Page
  • Orson Hyde

Footnotes

  1. [18]

    At this time, JS, Sidney Rigdon, and Frederick G. Williams composed the presidency of the high priesthood. (See Revelation, 8 Mar. 1833 [D&C 90:6].)

  2. [19]

    See Vision, 16 Feb. 1832 [D&C 76:57]; Psalm 110:4; and Hebrews 7:11.

  3. [20]

    See Revelation, 22–23 Sept. 1832 [D&C 84:2].

  4. [21]

    This “sacred Apostolical repository” refers to a separate block provided for the bishops’ storehouses.

  5. [22]

    Since not all twenty-four temples were to be constructed at once, the presidency designated with a cross the circle identified by the number 5 as the location where the first House of the Lord, or temple, was to be built and sent detailed specifications for its construction. (See Plan of the House of the Lord, between 1 and 25 June 1833; and Letter to Church Leaders in Jackson Co., MO, 25 June 1833.)

  6. [23]

    The name “holy Evangelical house” seems to relate to the high priests’ work as missionaries, since an evangelist was widely understood to be “a preacher or publisher of the gospel.” (“Evangelist,” in American Dictionary.)

    An American Dictionary of the English Language: Intended to Exhibit, I. the Origin, Affinities and Primary Signification of English Words, as far as They Have Been Ascertained. . . . Edited by Noah Webster. New York: S. Converse, 1828.

  7. [24]

    See Book of Mormon, 1830 ed., 260 [Alma 13:16].

  8. [25]

    See Isaiah 5:26; 11:12; and Book of Mormon, 1830 ed., 91 [2 Nephi 15:26].

  9. [26]

    See Hebrews 7:11. The “high priesthood after the order of Aron” seems contrary to the high priesthood (which was after the order of Melchizedek) that was understood to be in the church at this time. This designation probably refers to the bishopric, who presided in the lesser, or Aaronic, priesthood.

  10. [27]

    See Isaiah 62:10.

  11. [28]

    TEXT: This insertion is a correction made by Frederick G. Williams. The last line of the explanation transcribed here explains the correction. Williams apparently intended the text to read: “Nos. 19-20-21- house of the Lord for the high Priesthood after the order of Aron the law of the Kingdom of heaven and Messenger to the people.”

  12. [29]

    Priests, those ordained to the “high priesthood after the order of Aron,” were meant to be messengers “to the people,” while teachers, a lesser office in the Aaronic priesthood, were described as messengers “to the church.” The previous fall, a revelation made the following distinction between the respective functions of priests and teachers: “Behold the high Priest should travel and also the Elders and also the lesser Priests, but the Teacher and deacons should be appointed to watch over the church to be a standing minister unto the church.” (Revelation, 22–23 Sept. 1832 [D&C 84:111].)

  13. [30]

    Like the twenty-four temples listed here, the two sets of tiered pulpits that were to be built in the House of the Lord were labeled according to priesthood office, as shown on the temple plans sent to Missouri in June 1833. At one end, four tiers of pulpits, each with three seats, were to be built for, in ascending order, the deacons, teachers, priests, and presidency of the lesser priesthood. At the other end, four tiers of pulpits were for, in ascending order, the elders, high priests, bishops, and presidency of the high priesthood. The temple numbering in this paragraph follows that same pattern—the first three temples listed were for the elders, the next three for the high priests, and the third cluster for the bishops, with the highest numbers in the temple block for the presidency of the high priesthood. In the second block, the numbered temples were also assigned in ascending order to the deacons, teachers, priests, and presidency of the lesser priesthood. (Plan of the House of the Lord, between 1 and 25 June 1833.)

  14. [31]

    See Exodus 28:36; 39:30; and Zechariah 14:20.

  15. [32]

    These quotation marks have been editorially supplied for sense and do not appear in the copy of this letter found in JS Letterbook 1.

© 2024 by Intellectual Reserve, Inc. All rights reserved.Terms of UseUpdated 2021-04-13Privacy NoticeUpdated 2021-04-06