Footnotes
Questions 18 and 19 and their answers reflect the complex debate over the biblical canon—that is, the authoritative list of divinely inspired scriptural books. Many nineteenth-century Protestants advocated the belief in a closed canon, whereas some other groups, such as the Latter-day Saints, contended that revelation was still possible and that the canon was open. The church’s 1830 Articles and Covenants addressed this ongoing controversy with an allusion to Revelation 22:17–18. This commonly cited passage prohibits adding to or taking away from “the words of the prophecy of this book,” which commentators interpreted variously as referring to the book of Revelation alone or the Bible as a whole. The Articles and Covenants stated that JS’s revelations contained divine truth and neither added to nor diminished the book of Revelation or the Bible. (Bruce, Canon of Scripture, 17–24; Holland, Sacred Borders, 1–15, 26–29; Articles and Covenants, ca. Apr. 1830 [D&C 20:35].)
Bruce, Frederick F. The Canon of Scripture. Downers Grove, IL: Intervarsity Press, 1988.
Holland, David F. Sacred Borders: Continuing Revelation and Canonical Restraint in Early America. New York: Oxford University Press, 2011.
See Articles and Covenants, ca. Apr. 1830 [D&C 20:23–24].
See Revelation, Oct. 1830–B [D&C 33:15]; and Revelation, 5 Jan. 1831 [D&C 39:23].
See Revelation, ca. 8 Mar. 1831–A [D&C 46].
See Revelation, 5 Jan. 1831 [D&C 39:11].