Bill of particulars
Summary
“A detailed informal statement of a plaintiff’s cause of action or of a defendant’s set-off.” If a plaintiff makes a general declaration without specifying a cause of action, the judge may stay the proceedings and order the plaintiff to provide such a bill. If a defendant pleads a set-off, he or she may be required to give a bill for the set-off. Failure to do so will preclude defendant from giving supporting evidence at trial. The purpose of a bill of particulars is to “prevent surprise and procure a fair trial.”
Links
papers
- Bill of Costs, 30 May 1844 [ United States v. Jeremiah Smith on Habeas Corpus–A ]
- Bill of Particulars, circa 2 March 1843 [ Dana v. Brink ]
- Docket Entry, 2 May–circa 3 June 1844 [ City of Nauvoo v. A. Spencer ]
- Docket Entry, 2 May–circa 3 June 1844 [ City of Nauvoo v. C. A. Foster ]
- Docket Entry, 2 May–circa 3 June 1844 [ City of Nauvoo v. C. L. Higbee ]
- Docket Entry, 30–31 May 1844 [ United States v. Jeremiah Smith on Habeas Corpus–B ]
- Docket Entry, Copy, 16 October 1844 [ City of Nauvoo v. R. D. Foster–A ]
- Docket Entry, between 20 and circa 26 December 1842 [ Canfield v. Morey ]
- Docket Entry, circa 29 June 1837 [ Fisher v. Stratton ]
- Docket Entry, circa 3 June 1844 [ City of Nauvoo v. R. D. Foster–A ]
- Docket Entry, circa 31 July 1837 [ Rigdon, Smith & Cowdery for the use of JS v. Woodworth ]
- Introduction to Rigdon, Smith & Cowdery for the use of JS v. Woodworth
- Letter from Edward Hunter, 10 February 1842
- Minute Book 2
- Minutes, 13 April 1844
- Nauvoo City Council Rough Minute Book, February 1844–January 1845
- Trial Report, 4–22 March 1843 [ Dana v. Brink ]