The Papers
Browse the PapersDocumentsJournalsAdministrative RecordsRevelations and TranslationsHistoriesLegal RecordsFinancial RecordsOther Contemporary Papers
Reference
PeoplePlacesEventsGlossaryLegal GlossaryFinancial GlossaryCalendar of DocumentsWorks CitedFeatured TopicsLesson PlansRelated Publications
Media
VideosPhotographsIllustrationsChartsMapsPodcasts
News
Current NewsArchiveNewsletterSubscribeJSP Conferences
About
About the ProjectJoseph Smith and His PapersFAQAwardsEndorsementsReviewsEditorial MethodNote on TranscriptionsNote on Images of People and PlacesReferencing the ProjectCiting This WebsiteProject TeamContact Us
Published Volumes
  1. Home > 
  2. The Papers > 
Introduction to State of New York v. JS–B and State of New York v. JS–C Fee Bill, 4 July 1830 [State of New York v. JS–B] Fee Bill, circa 20 October 1830 [State of New York v. JS–B]

Introduction to State of New York v. JS–B and State of New York v. JS–C

Page

State of New York v. JS–B
Chenango Co., New York, Justice of the Peace Court, 29 June 1830
 
State of New York v. JS–C
Broome Co., New York, Court of Special Sessions of the Peace, 30 June 1830
 
Historical Introduction
In late June 1830, JS appeared before justices of the peace in two neighboring southern counties— and —for allegedly violating the state’s disorderly persons statute. The charges were filed by individuals who opposed the growth of the Church of Christ in Broome County.
Not long after the organization of the church on 6 April 1830 in , New York, JS visited the family of near in . JS had previously lived and worked with the Knights, and they had financially supported him while he was translating the Book of Mormon. During his April 1830 visit, JS “held several meetings in the neighbourhood,” prompting the Knights and others to consider joining the new church. JS returned to Fayette to preside at the church’s first conference, but by late June 1830 he was again in the Colesville area to oversee the baptisms of about thirteen people, including members of the Knight family. Protestant clergymen and other antagonists in the area viewed JS as a charlatan and sought to impede converts from joining the Church of Christ. Their tactics included destroying the dam that JS and others had constructed in a nearby stream to perform baptisms, abducting potential converts, and accusing JS of violating ’s disorderly persons statute based on his previous use of in the area.
This charge stemmed from JS’s first visit to the region, in November 1825, when wealthy farmer hired him to assist in searching for a Spanish silver mine on the side of the Susquehanna River. According to , Stowell sought out JS after hearing that “he was in possession of certain means by which he could discern things, that could not be seen by the natural eye.” Although the excavation was abandoned within a short time, JS spent winter 1825–1826 living in with Stowell, who employed him to perform various tasks, including using seer stones to locate valuable items that were believed to be buried in the ground. JS also purportedly used his seer stones in during those months. In March 1826, he was arrested and taken before Chenango County justice of the peace , who tried JS for allegedly violating the disorderly persons statute with his seer stone activities. The outcome of the trial remains uncertain. The following winter, JS lived with the Knight family in Broome County until his marriage to in January 1827.
recalled that JS’s opponents “made a Catspaw of a young fellow By the name of Docter Benton in ,” who filed a complaint in late June 1830 “against Joseph for as they said pertending to see under ground,” based on “a little Clause they found in the Laws against such things.” The statute identified several activities as “disorderly,” including “pretending to tell fortunes, or where lost or stolen items may be found.” Practices commonly associated with what some scholars have termed folk religion or folk magic, such as using seer stones, persisted in North America into the nineteenth century, despite growing Enlightenment-era skepticism. The use of the word “pretending” in the act reflected legal assumptions that such practices were categorically deceptive and fraudulent, regardless of sincere beliefs to the contrary. Based on the complaint, Chenango County justice of the peace Joseph Chamberlin issued a warrant for the arrest of JS.
During the evening of 28 June 1830, JS and his followers assembled at the Knight home to confirm those who had previously been baptized. When the meeting was about to begin, constable Ebenezer Hatch arrived and arrested JS on Chamberlin’s warrant. Hatch transported JS to South Bainbridge in Chenango County, and the two men stayed the night in a tavern. Meanwhile, employed the legal services of and John S. Reed, “respectable farmers” who, although not professional attorneys, were “renowned for their integrity, and well versed in the laws of their country.” The next day, Chamberlin presided at a trial to evaluate the charge against JS. According to his fee bill, the justice issued ten subpoenas for witnesses, although twelve ultimately testified, including , , Joseph Knight Sr., , , two unnamed daughters of Stowell, and Jonathan Thompson. Observers at the trial indicated that their testimony focused on JS’s character and his previous use of a seer stone. The prosecutors questioned the witnesses about events that allegedly took place outside of Chenango County, including how JS used his seer stones to locate the gold plates and to translate the Book of Mormon, the former having occurred in Manchester County and the latter primarily in . The defense counsel argued that such claims extended beyond Chamberlin’s jurisdiction.
While it is evident that JS was not convicted, historical sources are unclear regarding the precise outcome. JS’s history and Reed both stated that JS was , meaning he could not be charged again for the same offense; however, Reed also used the word “” to refer to the trial’s conclusion, which could result in a later charge. Joel K. Noble, a justice of the peace who presided at the subsequent trial in , indicated that JS’s defense before Chamberlin depended on ’s statute of limitations, which stated that prosecutions needed to be commenced within two years of the alleged offense. The alleged instances of JS using his seer stones in occurred at least four years prior to the bringing of charges.
As the trial was concluding during the night of 29–30 June, JS’s opponents brought a criminal charge against him in , presumably under the same disorderly persons statute cited in the first case. A Broome County constable arrested JS immediately after the Chenango County trial and transported him to , where they stayed at a tavern for the remainder of the night. The constable abused JS and permitted others to riducule him. The next morning, on 30 June 1830, JS was brought before Noble, who was evidently joined on the bench by two other justices of the peace. and a “Lawyer Burch” acted as prosecutors, while Reed and again represented JS. After hearing testimony, the court discharged JS, presumably on similar grounds as in the first trial.
Few documents produced for these cases are extant. Neither the docket books belonging to Justices Chamberlin and Noble nor the case files have apparently survived. However, the fee bills of Chamberlin and Constable Hatch, charging for their services, are extant and are featured here. On 19 September 1832, the Boston Christian Herald published what purported to be a “true copy” of the minutes taken by Noble during the 30 June 1830 trial. The paper obtained the text from an unidentified intermediary from Windsor, Broome County. From the published document, it appears that Noble—or possibly another individual—polished and possibly expanded the original notes into a formal trial report on 28 August 1832. The trial report identified the date of the proceedings; named the complainant, Samuel Dickinson; summarized the charge; provided witness testimonies, including on ; and concluded with Noble’s certification. The unidentified resident also forwarded a certified copy of an affidavit sworn by Preston T. Wilkins on 28 August 1832 regarding the trial. In the published account, the affidavit was followed by what appeared to be a summary of Noble’s ruling: “Joseph Smith, jr., was discharged; he had not looked in the glass for two years to find money, &c.—hence it was outlawed.” It is unclear whether this sentence originated with Noble, the unidentified letter writer, or the newspaper. Given the uncertain provenance of the trial report, it is included here as an appendix. Additional accounts of the trials are presented as related documents.
 
Calendar of Documents
This calendar lists all known documents created by or for the court, whether extant or not. It does not include versions of documents created for other purposes, though those versions may be listed in footnotes. In certain cases, especially in cases concerning unpaid debts, the originating document (promissory note, invoice, etc.) is listed here. Note that documents in the calendar are grouped with their originating court. Where a version of a document was subsequently filed with another court, that version is listed under both courts.
 
State of New York v. JS–B, Chenango Co., New York, Justice of the Peace Court

1830 (14)

June (12)

Ca. 28 June 1830

Complaint, before Joseph Chamberlin, Bainbridge Township, Chenango Co., NY

Ca. 28 June 1830

Joseph Chamberlin, Warrant, for JS, Bainbridge Township, Chenango Co., NY

Ca. 28 June 1830

Joseph Chamberlin, Subpoena, Bainbridge Township, Chenango Co., NY, ca. 28 June 1830–A

Ca. 28 June 1830

Joseph Chamberlin, Subpoena, Bainbridge Township, Chenango Co., NY, ca. 28 June 1830–B

Ca. 28 June 1830

Joseph Chamberlin, Subpoena, Bainbridge Township, Chenango Co., NY, ca. 28 June 1830–C

Ca. 28 June 1830

Joseph Chamberlin, Subpoena, Bainbridge Township, Chenango Co., NY, ca. 28 June 1830–D

Ca. 28 June 1830

Joseph Chamberlin, Subpoena, Bainbridge Township, Chenango Co., NY, ca. 28 June 1830–E

Ca. 28 June 1830

Joseph Chamberlin, Subpoena, Bainbridge Township, Chenango Co., NY, ca. 28 June 1830–F

Ca. 28 June 1830

Joseph Chamberlin, Subpoena, Bainbridge Township, Chenango Co., NY, ca. 28 June 1830–G

Ca. 28 June 1830

Joseph Chamberlin, Subpoena, Bainbridge Township, Chenango Co., NY, ca. 28 June 1830–H

Ca. 28 June 1830

Joseph Chamberlin, Subpoena, Bainbridge Township, Chenango Co., NY, ca. 28 June 1830–I

Ca. 28 June 1830

Joseph Chamberlin, Subpoena, Bainbridge Township, Chenango Co., NY, ca. 28 June 1830–J

July (1)

4 July 1830

Ebenezer Hatch, Fee Bill, Bainbridge Township, Chenango Co., NY

  • 4 July 1830; Chenango County Historical Society, Norwich, NY; handwriting of unidentified scribe, possibly Ebenezer Hatch, and second unidentified scribe; docket in unidentified handwriting, possibly Ebenezer Hatch; notation in unidentified handwriting.

October (1)

Ca. 20 October 1830

Joseph Chamberlin, Fee Bill, Bainbridge Township, Chenango Co., NY

  • Ca. 20 Oct. 1830; Chenango County Historical Society, Norwich, NY; handwriting of Joseph Chamberlin; docket in handwriting of Joseph Chamberlin; notation in unidentified handwriting.
 
State of New York v. JS–C, Broome Co., New York, Court of Special Sessions of the Peace

1830 (3)

June (3)

30 June 1830

Samuel Dickinson, Complaint, before Joel K. Noble, Colesville, Broome Co., NY

30 June 1830

Joel K. Noble, Warrant, for JS, Colesville, Broome Co., NY

30 June 1830

Docket Entry, Colesville, Broome Co., NY

  • 30 June 1830. Not extant.
View entire transcript

|

Cite this page

Source Note

Document Transcript

Page

Document Information

Related Case Documents
Editorial Title
Introduction to State of New York v. JS–B and State of New York v. JS–C
ID #
18695
Total Pages
1
Print Volume Location
Handwriting on This Page

    Footnotes

    1. [1]

      See map of Finger Lakes Region and Upper Susquehanna Valley, 1828–1831.

    2. [2]

      JS History, vol. A-1, 39–43; Hartley, Stand by My Servant Joseph, chap. 1.

      Hartley, William G. Stand by My Servant Joseph: The Story of the Joseph Knight Family and the Restoration. Provo, UT: Joseph Fielding Smith Institute for Latter-day Saint History; Salt Lake City: Deseret Book, 2003.

    3. [3]

      JS History, vol. A-1, 42–43; John Sherer, Colesville, Broome Co., NY, to Absalom Peters, Geneva, NY, 18 Nov. 1830, in Vogel, Early Mormon Documents, 4:91–93; “Mormonites,” 9 Apr. 1831 [State of New York v. JS–B].

      Vogel, Dan, ed. Early Mormon Documents. 5 vols. Salt Lake City: Signature Books, 1996–2003.

    4. [4]

      Lucy Mack Smith, History, 1845, 95; Historical Introduction to Agreement of Josiah Stowell and Others, 1 Nov. 1825; JS History, vol. A-1, 7–8; see also Ashurst-McGee, “Pathway to Prophethood,” chap. 4.

      Ashurst-McGee, Mark. “A Pathway to Prophethood: Joseph Smith Junior as Rodsman, Village Seer, and Judeo-Christian Prophet.” Master’s thesis, Utah State University, 2000.

    5. [5]

      Docket Entry, 20 Mar. 1826 [State of New York v. JS–A]; Vogel, “Locations of Joseph Smith’s Early Treasure Quests,” 219–227.

      Vogel, Dan. “The Locations of Joseph Smith’s Early Treasure Quests.” Dialogue: A Journal of Mormon Thought 27, no. 3 (Fall 1994): 197–231.

    6. [6]

      Introduction to State of New York v. JS–A.

    7. [7]

      After their marriage, JS and Emma Smith moved to the Smith family farm in Manchester, New York. (Knight, Reminiscences, 2; JS History, vol. A-1, 8.)

      Knight, Joseph, Sr. Reminiscences, no date. CHL. MS 3470.

    8. [8]

      Knight, Reminiscences, 8. John S. Reed, a New York farmer who served as JS’s attorney during the trials, recalled that Nathan Boynton was a key instigator of the proceedings against JS “for the Crime of Glass Looking and juglin forten telling and so on—for witch the State of New york was against and made it a Crime.” (Letter, John S. Reed to Brigham Young, 6 Dec. 1861; see also JS History, vol. A-1, 47–48.)

      Knight, Joseph, Sr. Reminiscences, no date. CHL. MS 3470.

    9. [9]

      A person convicted under the statute was required to enter into a recognizance to keep the peace for one year. (An Act concerning the Territorial Limits and Divisions, the Civil Policy, and the Internal Administration of This State [3 Dec. 1827], Revised Statutes of the State of New-York [1829], vol. 1, p. 638, chap. 20, title 5, secs. 1–2.)

      The Revised Statutes of the State of New-York, Passed During the Years One Thousand Eight Hundred and Twenty-Seven, and One Thousand Eight Hundred and Twenty-Eight: To Which Are Added, Certain Former Acts Which Have Not Been Revised. 3 Vols. Albany: Packard and Van Benthuysen, 1829.

    10. [10]

      See Walker, “Persisting Idea of American Treasure Hunting,” 429–459; Ashurst-McGee, “Pathway to Prophethood,” 62–68; Butler, Awash in a Sea of Faith, 67–98; and Taylor, “Early Republic’s Supernatural Economy,” 6–34. Recent scholarship has pointed out that terms such as “magic” imply a value judgment on the proper method of religious belief while isolating a peripheral belief system. (See Coudert, Religion, Magic, and Science, xiii–xxix.)

      Walker, Ronald W. “The Persisting Idea of American Treasure Hunting.” BYU Studies 24, no. 4 (Fall 1984): 429–459.

      Ashurst-McGee, Mark. “A Pathway to Prophethood: Joseph Smith Junior as Rodsman, Village Seer, and Judeo-Christian Prophet.” Master’s thesis, Utah State University, 2000.

      Butler, Jon. Awash in a Sea of Faith: Christianizing the American People. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1990.

      Taylor, Alan. “The Early Republic’s Supernatural Economy: Treasure Seeking in the American Northeast, 1780–1830.” American Quarterly 38, no. 1 (Spring 1986): 6–34.

      Coudert, Allison P. Religion, Magic, and Science in Early Modern Europe and America. Santa Barbara, CA: Praeger, 2011.

    11. [11]

      Davies, America Bewitched, 46.

      Davies, Owen. America Bewitched: The Story of Witchcraft After Salem. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.

    12. [12]

      Fee Bill, ca. 20 Oct. 1830 [State of New York v. JS–B].

    13. [13]

      Fee Bill, ca. 20 Oct. 1830 [State of New York v. JS–B]; JS History, vol. A-1, 44–45; “Mormonites,” 9 Apr. 1831 [State of New York v. JS–B].

    14. [14]

      JS History, vol. A-1, 44–45; “Mormonites,” 9 Apr. 1831 [State of New York v. JS–B].

    15. [15]

      JS History, vol. A-1, 45; “Some of the Remarks of John S. Reed,” 1 June 1844; Letter, John S. Reed to Brigham Young, 6 Dec. 1861.

    16. [16]

      Joel K. Noble, Bainbridge, Chenango Co., NY, to Jonathan B. Turner, Jacksonville, Morgan Co., IL, 8 Mar. 1842, in Vogel, Early Mormon Documents, 4:108–109; An Act concerning Courts and Ministers of Justice, and Proceedings in Civil Cases [10 Dec. 1828], Revised Statutes of the State of New-York [1829], vol. 2, p. 297, chap. 4, title 2, art. 3, sec. 29.

      Vogel, Dan, ed. Early Mormon Documents. 5 vols. Salt Lake City: Signature Books, 1996–2003.

      The Revised Statutes of the State of New-York, Passed During the Years One Thousand Eight Hundred and Twenty-Seven, and One Thousand Eight Hundred and Twenty-Eight: To Which Are Added, Certain Former Acts Which Have Not Been Revised. 3 Vols. Albany: Packard and Van Benthuysen, 1829.

    17. [17]

      See Appendix: Docket Entry, 20 Mar. 1826 [State of New York v. JS–A].

    18. [18]

      JS History, vol. A-1, 45; Trial Report, 28 Aug. 1832 [State of New York v. JS–C]; Letter, John S. Reed to Brigham Young, 6 Dec. 1861.

    19. [19]

      Trial Report, 28 Aug. 1832 [State of New York v. JS–C]; JS History, vol. A-1, 46. Noble himself did not report that he was joined by additional justices, but Reed recalled that multiple justices were present. New York law permitted “three justices of the peace of the same county” to form a “court of special sessions of the peace.” (“Some of the Remarks of John S. Reed,” 1 June 1844 ; An Act concerning Courts and Ministers of Justice, and Proceedings in Civil Cases [10 Dec. 1828], Revised Statutes of the State of New-York [1829], vol. 2, p. 224, chap. 2, title 2, sec. 3.)

      The Revised Statutes of the State of New-York, Passed During the Years One Thousand Eight Hundred and Twenty-Seven, and One Thousand Eight Hundred and Twenty-Eight: To Which Are Added, Certain Former Acts Which Have Not Been Revised. 3 Vols. Albany: Packard and Van Benthuysen, 1829.

    20. [20]

      JS History, vol. A-1, 47; Letter, John S. Reed to Brigham Young, 6 Dec. 1861; Unidentified Author, Windsor, NY, to Unidentified Recipient, Boston, MA, 30 Aug. 1832, in Boston Christian Herald, 19 Sept. 1832, [2]–[3].

      Boston Christian Herald. Boston. 1829–1833.

    21. [21]

      Fee Bill, ca. 20 Oct 1830 [State of New York v. JS–B]; Fee Bill, 4 July 1830 [State of New York v. JS–B].

    22. [22]

      “Mormonism,” 19 Sept. 1832 [State of New York v. JS–C].

    23. [23]

      Trial Report, 28 Aug. 1832 [State of New York v. JS–C]. In 1842, Noble summarized the 30 June 1830 trial in a letter to Jonathan B. Turner, noting details about the witness testimonies that also appeared in the trial report. This suggests that Noble was the source of both documents. (Joel K. Noble, Bainbridge, Chenango Co., NY, to Jonathan B. Turner, Jacksonville, Morgan Co., IL, 8 Mar. 1842, in Vogel, Early Mormon Documents, 4:109.)

      Vogel, Dan, ed. Early Mormon Documents. 5 vols. Salt Lake City: Signature Books, 1996–2003.

    © 2024 by Intellectual Reserve, Inc. All rights reserved.Terms of UseUpdated 2021-04-13Privacy NoticeUpdated 2021-04-06