, “Brief History,” Manuscript, ca. 6 April 1838– ca. 26 January 1839; handwriting of and an unidentified scribe; seventy pages numbered 20–90, plus three unnumbered pages; John Fletcher Darby Papers, Missouri History Museum Archives, St. Louis.
, a careful observer, had enjoyed a close association with Mormon leaders, and consequently his account provides valuable insights into the development and structure of the early church. He summarized many of the doctrines taught by JS and provided a detailed description of the conflict between the Latter-day Saints and other settlers. But his chronicle also related the story of a personal spiritual journey into and then out of the church as came to disapprove of the church’s course in 1838 in Missouri. Yet despite his estrangement from the church and his excommunication in 1839, he retained a degree of sympathy for the Saints and maintained some contact.
apparently began compiling portions of his account while serving as an officially appointed church historian in . He probably completed his narrative by 11 February 1839, when he secured a copyright with the district federal copyright office. He arranged for Thomas Watson & Son of to print A Brief History. The entire print run may have included up to twelve hundred copies.
The document presented here, ’s circa 1838–1839 rough draft of his history, is incomplete. It includes the title page, copyright notice, and preface but is missing twenty-one pages, including the nineteen pages that constitute chapters 1 through 6. The manuscript is almost entirely in Corrill’s handwriting, though some of the chapter summaries (added after he drafted the narrative) were written in a different hand, possibly that of the printer.
’s published version of A Brief History receives comprehensive treatment in volume 2 of the Histories series of The Joseph Smith Papers and is available on this website as part of the history series.
Page 82
in their behalf to the Legislature setting forth a short history of their difficulties from their first settlement in to the present time and praying the Legislature to recind the s recind the exterminating order under which they were compeled to leave the , and also release them from the deed of trust made in duress, pay them for their arms or return them, and pay them for their arms taken from them as well as othr damages sustained by them in and let them have the privilege of living in the . (When took their arms in he agreed to return them as soon as they left the , but this he refused to do even on the s order for them.) Some two hundred families have left and others are preparing to go, But those some are desirous to stay in the , and their object in getting up the petition was to be relieved from their expelling contract so that men should not have the privilege of abusing them under a legal pretence, thinking it was right because they agreed to leave the thought that contract was strictly in illegal. This petition I presented to the Legislature on the 19 Dec. It produced some excitement, and in the house and was laid on the table for the present. I will now state