The Papers
Browse the PapersDocumentsJournalsAdministrative RecordsRevelations and TranslationsHistoriesLegal RecordsFinancial RecordsOther Contemporary Papers
Reference
PeoplePlacesEventsGlossaryLegal GlossaryFinancial GlossaryCalendar of DocumentsWorks CitedFeatured TopicsLesson PlansRelated Publications
Media
VideosPhotographsIllustrationsChartsMapsPodcasts
News
Current NewsArchiveNewsletterSubscribeJSP Conferences
About
About the ProjectJoseph Smith and His PapersFAQAwardsEndorsementsReviewsEditorial MethodNote on TranscriptionsNote on Images of People and PlacesReferencing the ProjectCiting This WebsiteProject TeamContact Us
Published Volumes
  1. Home > 
  2. The Papers > 

Letter from John E. Page, 8 August 1842

Source Note

, Letter, , Allegheny Co., PA, to JS, , Hancock Co., IL, 8 Aug. 1842; handwriting of ; three pages; JS Collection, CHL. Includes address, docket, and notation.
Bifolium measuring 7½ × 6 inches (19 × 15 cm). The bifolium was manually created by folding a single leaf of lined paper, with the printed lines vertical. Both leaves are ruled with about eighteen blue lines (now faded). The right, left, and bottom edges have the square cut of manufactured paper; the top edge is jagged, suggesting it was torn from a bound volume or a larger piece of paper. The letter was inscribed in blue ink. The document was trifolded twice in letter style, addressed, and sealed with a red adhesive wafer. Remnants of the wafer are located on the recto of the second leaf. The letter was later refolded for filing. Some separation has occurred along the folds of the second leaf.
, who served as scribe to JS from 1842 to 1844, docketed the document. The notation “Copied by A.J.” was apparently added by a clerk or secretary for Andrew Jenson, who served as assistant church historian from 1897 to 1941. The document was listed in an inventory that was produced by the Church Historian’s Office circa 1904. By 1973 the document had been included in the JS Collection at the Church Historical Department (now CHL). The document’s early docket and notation, the circa 1904 inventory, and inclusion in the JS Collection by 1973 indicate continuous institutional custody.

Footnotes

  1. [1]

    JS, Journal, 29 June 1842; “Clayton, William,” in Jenson, Latter-day Saint Biographical Encyclopedia, 1:718.

    Jenson, Andrew. Latter-day Saint Biographical Encyclopedia: A Compilation of Biographical Sketches of Prominent Men and Women in the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. 4 vols. Salt Lake City: Andrew Jenson History Co., 1901–1936.

  2. [2]

    Bitton and Arrington, Mormons and Their Historians, 48–52, 55.

    Jenson, Andrew. Latter-day Saint Biographical Encyclopedia: A Compilation of Biographical Sketches of Prominent Men and Women in the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. 4 vols. Salt Lake City: Andrew Jenson History Co., 1901–1936.

  3. [3]

    “Letters to and from the Prophet,” ca. 1904, 1, Historian’s Office, Catalogs and Inventories, 1846–1904, CHL.

    Historian’s Office. Catalogs and Inventories, 1846–1904. CHL. CR 100 130.

  4. [4]

    See the full bibliographic entry for JS Collection, 1827–1844, in the CHL catalog.

Historical Introduction

In response to a 16 July 1842 letter from JS, wrote this 8 August 1842 letter from , where he was proselytizing, to JS in , Illinois. In his letter, Page expressed concern about how accusations from and others were influencing public opinion. Several newspapers, including the Sangamo Journal, had published letters from both Bennett and Martha Brotherton, an eighteen-year-old convert from , alleging that JS, , and confined Brotherton in a room in Nauvoo and told her it was God’s will that she marry Young as a plural wife. Rumors about a marriage proposal to Brotherton had apparently existed in Nauvoo since at least April, but they gained a wider audience with the publication of Bennett’s and Brotherton’s letters. Concerned that such statements were destroying the reputation of JS and other leaders, Page, who was also one of the , urged JS, Young, and Kimball to denounce the allegations.
The lack of postal markings suggests that a courier hand carried the letter. It likely reached within a few weeks. The docket on the letter by indicates that the letter reached Nauvoo, but when JS received it is unclear, especially since he was in hiding for much of August. However, on 26 August 1842, JS discussed with the Quorum of the Twelve Apostles plans to send on missions to the eastern to counteract ’s accusations. On 27 August, perhaps in response to ’s pleas in the letter, and both swore affidavits refuting Brotherton’s charges. These affidavits were published as a broadside on 31 August 1842.

Footnotes

  1. [1]

    Letter to John E. Page, 16 July 1842.

  2. [2]

    “Miss Brotherton’s Statement,” Sangamo Journal (Springfield, IL), 22 July 1842, [2].

    Sangamo Journal. Springfield, IL. 1831–1847.

  3. [3]

    Minutes and Discourses, 6–8 Apr. 1842.

  4. [4]

    JS, Journal, 26 Aug. 1842; “Affidavit of H. C. Kimball” and “Affidavit of Brigham Young,” in Affidavits and Certificates [Nauvoo, IL: 1842], copy at CHL; see also “Testimony of J. McIlwrick” and Vilate Murray Kimball, Affidavit, Hancock Co., IL, 30 Aug. 1842, in Affidavits and Certificates [Nauvoo, IL: 1842], copy at CHL.

    Affidavits and Certificates, Disproving the Statements and Affidavits Contained in John C. Bennett’s Letters. Nauvoo Aug. 31, 1842. [Nauvoo, IL: 1842]. Copy at CHL.

Page [2]

The disclosures of has done much to injure the cause of the kingdom here the people are anxiously looking for the full and effectually downfall of mormonism through a Judas of a — At It becomes you and Brothers and to show your selves men of the God of Isreal this once to <​put​> down the slanders of and Martha Brotherton— If you do it and do it well, I think it will join newr force and power of influence of the cause of truth over the people. Please Dear Brethern do quickly and doit well life life or death now— [p. [2]]
View entire transcript

|

Cite this page

Source Note

Document Transcript

Page [2]

Document Information

Related Case Documents
Editorial Title
Letter from John E. Page, 8 August 1842
ID #
900
Total Pages
4
Print Volume Location
JSP, D10:361–364
Handwriting on This Page
  • John E. Page

Footnotes

  1. [3]

    In her letter reprinted in the Sangamo Journal, Brotherton stated that after Brigham Young asked her to marry him and she asked for time to consider it, JS told her that it was “lawful and right before God” and that “if there is any sin in it,” he would “answer for it before God.” JS, Young, and Heber C. Kimball all denied Brotherton’s allegations—with Young stating that her affidavit was “a base falsehood, with regard to any private intercourse or unlawful conduct or conversation with me.” Brotherton’s brother-in-law John McIlwrick also stated both privately and publicly that she was a liar and a hypocrite. (“Miss Brotherton’s Statement,” Sangamo Journal [Springfield, IL], 22 July 1842, [2]; “Affidavit of H. C. Kimball,” “Affidavit of Brigham Young,” and “Testimony of J. McIlwrick,” in Affidavits and Certificates [Nauvoo, IL: 1842], copy at CHL; Minutes and Discourses, 6–8 Apr. 1842; John McIlwrick, Nauvoo, IL, to Martha Brotherton, 25 May 1842, Brigham Young Office Files, CHL.)

    Sangamo Journal. Springfield, IL. 1831–1847.

    Affidavits and Certificates, Disproving the Statements and Affidavits Contained in John C. Bennett’s Letters. Nauvoo Aug. 31, 1842. [Nauvoo, IL: 1842]. Copy at CHL.

    Brigham Young Office. Halsted, Haines & Co. File, 1867. CHL.

© 2024 by Intellectual Reserve, Inc. All rights reserved.Terms of UseUpdated 2021-04-13Privacy NoticeUpdated 2021-04-06