Footnotes
Sylvester Smith to Oliver Cowdery, Kirtland, OH, 28 Oct. 1834, in LDS Messenger and Advocate, Oct. 1834, 1:10–11.
Latter Day Saints’ Messenger and Advocate. Kirtland, OH. Oct. 1834–Sept. 1837.
Minutes, 11 Sept. 1833; Letter to Edward Partridge et al., 30 Mar. 1834; Oliver Cowdery, Kirtland Mills, OH, to Ambrose Palmer, New Portage, OH, 30 Oct. 1833, in Cowdery, Letterbook, 8; F. G. Williams & Co., Account Book, 1; Oliver Cowdery, “To the Patrons of the Evening and the Morning Star,” The Evening and the Morning Star, Dec. 1833, 113; Revelation, 23 Apr. 1834 [D&C 104:28–30].
Cowdery, Oliver. Letterbook, 1833–1838. Huntington Library, San Marino, CA.
F. G. Williams & Co. Account Book, 1833–1835. CHL. In Patience Cowdery, Diary, 1849–1851. CHL. MS 3493.
The Evening and the Morning Star. Independence, MO, June 1832–July 1833; Kirtland, OH, Dec. 1833–Sept. 1834.
Minutes, 17 Aug. 1835. These minutes refer to this 24 September 1834 high council meeting as “a general assembly of the Church in Kirtland.”
Revelation, 23 Apr. 1834 [D&C 104:58].
See Historical Introduction to Minutes, ca. 3–4 June 1831; and Historical Introduction to Minutes, 25–26 Oct. 1831. The Kirtland high council may have been responding to unauthorized ordinations of high priests. In late July, for example, the Missouri high council found Samuel Brown’s ordination of Sylvester Hulet as a high priest to be unlawful because Brown had not obtained the proper authorization to ordain Hulet. (Minute Book 2, 31 July–1 Aug. 1834.)
(viz.) | ||
For a description of the duties and responsibilities of this office, see Minutes, 17 Feb. 1834.
Since Luke Johnson and Orson Hyde both participated in the Camp of Israel, they had witnessed at least some of the interactions between JS and Sylvester Smith on that march. All four of those chosen to speak were familiar with the particulars of the case, as they had all listened to and discussed the matter at earlier hearings. Those whose names are on the left side of the list likely spoke on behalf of the church, while those whose names are on the right side likely spoke on behalf of the accused. Since Sylvester Smith was the accused, he was replaced by Hyde. (Revised Minutes, 18–19 Feb. 1834 [D&C 102:12–18]; Account with the Church of Christ, ca. 11–29 Aug. 1834.)
In the letter he was required to publish, Sylvester Smith acknowledged, as a contrite “lover of righteousness and truth,” the conflicts he had experienced with JS and expressed his faults in accusing JS, who, Smith stated, “had conducted worthily, and adorned his profession as a man of God, while journeying to and from Missouri.” Smith closed his letter, stating, “I have received testimony from the heavens, that the work of the Lord, brought forth by means of the book of Mormon, in our day, through the instrumentality of bro. Joseph Smith jr. is eternal truth, and must stand, though the heavens and the earth pass away.” (Sylvester Smith to Oliver Cowdery, Kirtland, OH, 28 Oct. 1834, in LDS Messenger and Advocate, Oct. 1834, 1:10–11.)
Latter Day Saints’ Messenger and Advocate. Kirtland, OH. Oct. 1834–Sept. 1837.
The minutes list two clerks, Oliver Cowdery and Orson Hyde. It is not clear which clerk seconded this nomination by JS.
The rules governing the high council state that “whenever any vacancy shall occur by death, removeal from office, for transgression, or removal from the bounds of this church government of any one of the above named counsellors, it shall be filled by the nomination of the president, or presidents and sanctioned by the voice of a general Council of high priests convened for that purpose to act in the name of the Church.” (Revised Minutes, 18–19 Feb. 1834 [D&C 102:8].)
At the organizational meetings of the Kirtland and Missouri high councils, fathers in attendance blessed their sons who were called to the high council. (See Minutes, 19 Feb. 1834; and Minutes and Discourse, ca. 7 July 1834.)
Greene and Young served in this capacity only for this meeting. According to the minutes at the creation of the high council, at least seven standing members of the council were required to be present in order to conduct business. Seven or more members had the “power to appoint other high priests whom they may consider worthy and capable to act in the place of absent counsellors.” (Revised Minutes, 18–19 Feb. 1834 [D&C 102:7].)