The Papers
Browse the PapersDocumentsJournalsAdministrative RecordsRevelations and TranslationsHistoriesLegal RecordsFinancial RecordsOther Contemporary Papers
Reference
PeoplePlacesEventsGlossaryLegal GlossaryFinancial GlossaryCalendar of DocumentsWorks CitedFeatured TopicsLesson PlansRelated Publications
Media
VideosPhotographsIllustrationsChartsMapsPodcasts
News
Current NewsArchiveNewsletterSubscribeJSP Conferences
About
About the ProjectJoseph Smith and His PapersFAQAwardsEndorsementsReviewsEditorial MethodNote on TranscriptionsNote on Images of People and PlacesReferencing the ProjectCiting This WebsiteProject TeamContact Us
Published Volumes
  1. Home > 
  2. The Papers > 
Affidavit, 8 August 1838 [State of Missouri v. JS et al. for Riot] Appendix: Petition to Elias Higbee, circa 16 August 1838 [State of Missouri v. JS et al. for Riot] Habeas Corpus, circa 16 August 1838, Draft [State of Missouri v. JS et al. for Riot] Affidavit, 5 September 1838 [State of Missouri v. JS et al. for Riot] Petition, circa 11 September 1838 [State of Missouri v. JS et al. for Riot]

Affidavit, 5 September 1838 [State of Missouri v. JS et al. for Riot]

Source Note

JS, Affidavit, , Caldwell Co., MO, 5 Sept. 1838; handwriting of and ; signature of JS; certified by ; three pages. Featured version inserted in Sidney Rigdon and others (including JS), “To the Publick”; JS Collection, CHL.
Bifolium measuring 12½ × 7⅞ inches (32 × 20 cm), with forty very faded lines per page. The affidavit was folded for filing. The lack of official filing notations suggests that the featured version of the affidavit was not submitted to the Daviess County Circuit Court. In 1839, the featured copy was inserted in “To the Publick,” a petition draft that was prepared by and others in and was published in 1840 as An Appeal to the American People. The affidavit, along with “To the Publick,” has likely remained in continuous institutional custody.

Footnotes

  1. [1]

    [Rigdon], Appeal to the American People, 26–28.

Historical Introduction

On 5 September 1838, JS prepared an affidavit describing his involvement in a confrontation between a group of armed men and , a justice of the peace in , Missouri. The confrontation occurred in response to rumors of a fight between Latter-day Saints and other Missourians at an election held on 6 August 1838 in , the seat of Daviess County. Reports indicated two church members were killed, and this news prompted JS and dozens of Latter-day Saint men to travel from , Caldwell County, Missouri, to Daviess County to investigate. At in Daviess County, the men learned that no one had been killed, although several on both sides were severely injured. There were also reports that Adam Black—who in 1837 had helped lead an attempt to expel Latter-day Saints from Daviess County—was again assembling vigilantes to move against the Saints. On 8 August, JS and more than one hundred Latter-day Saint men visited Black’s residence, where after a heated exchange Black wrote and signed a statement indicating he would uphold the Constitution and the Saints’ rights.
On 10 August, ’s ally and other citizens visited , Missouri, and presented a complaint against JS and to Judge . In the complaint, Peniston and three others claimed that JS, Wight, and more than one hundred other Latter-day Saints had surrounded Black’s home and compelled him, under the threat of death, to sign an agreement, the contents of which Peniston and the others did not disclose. Peniston and his companions also asserted that five hundred armed Latter-day Saints—“whose movements and conduct are of a highly insurrectionary and unlawful character”—had assembled in Daviess County “to take revenge for some injuries or immaginary injuries done to some of their friends.” Based on these allegations, King issued a warrant to arrest JS and Wight, with Daviess County sheriff William Morgan assigned to complete the task.
When the sheriff went to ’s home in , Wight reportedly refused arrest, arguing that “the law had never protected him”—presumably referring to the failure of civil authorities to protect the Saints in , Missouri, in late 1833. Furthermore, Wight allegedly said “that the whole state of could not take him.” Morgan, who opted against taking Wight by force, then proceeded to , where he presented JS with the warrant on 16 August 1838. According to JS’s journal, which was keeping, JS informed the sheriff that although he was willing to submit to arrest, “he wished to be tried in his own as the Citisens of were highly exasperated toward him.” Morgan left Far West without serving the warrant, stating that he needed to consult with . Upon returning to Far West, Morgan declined to arrest JS, apparently because Morgan believed he was not authorized to act outside of Daviess County. Meanwhile, , , and others advertised that “the leaders of the banditti”—a reference to the Latter-day Saints—“have not, and say they will not be taken nor submit to the laws of the land.” Black’s allies called upon vigilantes in neighboring counties to become the law’s “executors,” setting 7 September as the day appointed to arrest JS and Wight.
On 2 September, rumors reached JS that men were gathering from eleven counties to arrest him and . noted in JS’s journal, “This looks a leettle to[o] much like mobocracy, it foretells some evil intentions,” suggesting that the Saints believed and his allies ultimately intended to expel church members from . Prompted by these reports, JS contacted attorney and militia commander for assistance. On 4 September, Atchison met with JS in and promised to “do all in his power to disperce the mob” and to represent JS and Wight in court. The two church leaders agreed to submit to arrest, and Atchison arranged a preliminary hearing with to be held near the boundary between and Daviess counties on 6 September, a date probably chosen to preempt the vigilantes’ plan to arrest JS on 7 September.
In preparation for the hearing, on 5 September JS composed this affidavit with and , who was a justice of the court. In the affidavit, JS described the rumors of violence at the polls, the subsequent expedition of Latter-day Saint men from Caldwell County to , and the Saints’ peaceful intentions at ’s home. Higbee inscribed the first two pages and parts of the third page of the document, while Robinson wrote other portions of the third page. Both Higbee and Robinson made changes to the document as they wrote, but some alterations may have been made at a later time. After the affidavit was completed, JS signed the document and Higbee certified it. Although JS may have intended to submit the affidavit to , no extant evidence indicates the affidavit was filed with the court. However, the four witnesses who testified on JS’s behalf at the hearing likely conveyed the content of the affidavit to the judge.
See also Introduction to State of Missouri v. JS et al. for Riot.

Footnotes

  1. [1]

    Sidney Rigdon recalled that Josiah Morin, a Democratic candidate from Daviess County and a friend to the Latter-day Saints, reported the election-day affray to church leaders in Far West, although he was not at the polls when the fighting broke out. John P. Greene indicated that several messengers brought word of the fracas. (Sidney Rigdon, JS, et al., Petition Draft [“To the Publick”], pp. 12[a]–[12b]; Greene, Facts relative to the Expulsion, 19.)

    Greene, John P. Facts Relative to the Expulsion of the Mormons or Latter Day Saints, from the State of Missouri, under the “Exterminating Order.” By John P. Greene, an Authorized Representative of the Mormons. Cincinnati: R. P. Brooks, 1839.

  2. [2]

    Adam Black, Certificate, 27 July 1838, copy; William Bowman, Certificate, no date, copy; John Brassfield, Certificate, no date, copy, Record Group 233, Records of the U.S. House of Representatives, National Archives, Washington DC; “A History, of the Persecution,” Times and Seasons, Mar. 1840, 1:65–66; JS, Journal, 7–9 Aug. 1838; Samuel Brown, Affidavit, Caldwell Co., MO, 5 Sept. 1838, pp. 11[a]–[11b], in Sidney Rigdon, JS, et al., Petition Draft (“To the Publick”).

    Record Group 233, Records of the U.S. House of Representatives / Petitions and Memorials, Resolutions of State Legislatures, and Related Documents Which Were Referred to the Committee on Judiciary during the 27th Congress. Committee on the Judiciary, Petitions and Memorials, 1813–1968. Record Group 233, Records of the U.S. House of Representatives, 1789–2015. National Archives, Washington DC. The LDS records cited herein are housed in National Archives boxes 40 and 41 of Library of Congress boxes 139–144 in HR27A-G10.1.

  3. [3]

    JS, Journal, 7–9 Aug. 1838; Adam Black, Complaint, Daviess Co., MO, 28 Aug. 1838, copy, Mormon War Papers, MSA.

    Mormon War Papers, 1838–1841. MSA.

  4. [4]

    Wight was probably named along with JS because Wight was widely considered the leader of the Latter-day Saints in Daviess County.

  5. [5]

    William Peniston et al., Complaint, Ray Co., MO, 10 Aug. 1838, State of Missouri v. JS et al. for Riot (Mo. 5th Jud. Cir. 1838), microfilm 959,084, U.S. and Canada Record Collection, FHL. Black, who wrote a similar statement on 8 August 1838, was apparently not in Richmond on 10 August. Along with Peniston, three other men—William Bowman, Wilson McKinney, and John Netherton—signed the 10 August complaint. (Adam Black, Affidavit, Daviess Co., MO, 8 Aug. 1838, in “Public Meeting,” Missouri Republican [St. Louis], 3 Sept. 1838, [2].)

    Missouri Republican. St. Louis. 1822–1919.

  6. [6]

    Warrant, Ray Co., MO, 10 Aug. 1838, State of Missouri v. JS et al. for Riot (Mo. 5th Jud. Cir. 1838), microfilm 959,084, U.S. and Canada Record Collection, FHL. King did not identify a charge in the warrant. In April 1839, a Daviess County grand jury indicted JS, Wight, and other Latter-day Saint men for causing a riot at Black’s home. (Indictment, [Honey Creek Township, MO], [ca. 10] Apr. 1839, State of Missouri v. JS et al. for Riot [Daviess Co. Cir. Ct. 1839], Historical Department, Nineteenth-Century Legal Documents Collection, CHL.)

  7. [7]

    “Mormon War,” Missouri Republican (St. Louis), 3 Sept. 1838, [2]; see also Historical Introduction to Letter from William W. Phelps, 6–7 Nov. 1833.

    Missouri Republican. St. Louis. 1822–1919.

  8. [8]

    JS, Journal, 16–18 Aug. 1838; see also Petition to Elias Higbee, ca. 16 Aug. 1838. Morgan was apparently unaware of a Missouri statute that permitted him to work through a local magistrate to serve the warrant. (An Act to Regulate Proceedings in Criminal Cases [21 Mar. 1835], Revised Statutes of the State of Missouri [1835], p. 475, art. 2, secs. 4–5.)

    The Revised Statutes of the State of Missouri, Revised and Digested by the Eighth General Assembly, During the Years One Thousand Eight Hundred and Thirty-Four, and One Thousand Eight Hundred and Thirty-Five. Together with the Constitutions of Missouri and of the United States. 3rd ed. St. Louis: Chambers and Knapp, 1841.

  9. [9]

    “Public Meeting,” Missouri Republican (St. Louis), 3 Sept. 1838, [2]; “The Mormons,” Missouri Argus (St. Louis), 6 Sept. 1838, [1]; “Mormons Once More,” Hannibal (MO) Commercial Advertiser, 25 Sept. 1838, [1]; “Mormon Troubles,” Missouri Republican, 19 Sept. 1838, [2].

    Missouri Republican. St. Louis. 1822–1919.

    Missouri Argus. St. Louis. 1835–1841.

    Hannibal Commercial Advertiser. Hannibal, MO. 1837–1839.

  10. [10]

    JS, Journal, 2 Sept. 1838.

  11. [11]

    JS, Journal, 4 and 6 Sept. 1838; Austin A. King, Ray Co., MO, to William Morgan, Daviess Co., MO, 4 Sept. 1838, William Morgan, Papers, CHL.

    Morgan, William. Papers, 1838–1839. CHL. MS 19757.

  12. [12]

    Although JS referred to himself as a “deponent” in the document, the format more closely matches that of an affidavit—a sworn statement. A deposition is an official transcript of a witness’s testimony before a “competent tribunal,” with the witness “answer[ing] all the interrogatories.” (“Affidavit” and “Deposition,” in Bouvier, Law Dictionary, 1:63, 313.)

    Bouvier, John. A Law Dictionary, Adapted to the Constitution and Laws of the United States of America, and of the Several States of the American Union; with References to the Civil and Other Systems of Foreign Law. 2 vols. Philadelphia: T. and J. W. Johnson, 1839.

  13. [13]

    Higbee and Robinson may have made additional changes to the affidavit in 1839, when they assisted Sidney Rigdon in preparing a history of the conflicts between the Latter-day Saints and other Missourians. The published history includes a version of the affidavit that incorporates Higbee’s and Robinson’s changes. Since it is unknown when each change was made, each has been reproduced here. (Sidney Rigdon, JS, et al., Petition Draft [“To the Publick”], pp. 15[a]–[15c]; [Rigdon], Appeal to the American People, 26–28.)

  14. [14]

    It is possible that a fair copy of the affidavit was made and submitted to King in 1838 and filed the following year in the Daviess County Circuit Court with other documents pertaining to the case. In 1974, when the contents of the case files were microfilmed, the affidavit was missing. (See Source Note for Recognizance, 7 Sept. 1838.)

  15. [15]

    The four defense witnesses were Robinson, Dimick B. Huntington, Gideon Carter, and Adam Lightner. (JS, Journal, 7 Sept. 1838.)

Asterisk (*) denotes a "featured" version, which includes an introduction and annotation. Sidney Rigdon, JS, et al., Petition Draft (“To the Publick”), circa 1838–1839 *Affidavit, 5 September 1838 [ State of Missouri v. JS et al. for Riot ] Sidney Rigdon, JS, et al., Petition Draft (“To the Publick”), circa 1838–1839 Sidney Rigdon, Appeal to the American People, 1840 Sidney Rigdon, Appeal to the American People, 1840, Second Edition History, 1838–1856, volume B-1 [1 September 1834–2 November 1838] “History of Joseph Smith”

Page [2]

, to a considerable number, and that was at their head, and were to attack the Mormons <​saints​> the next day, at the place where we then were, called , this report, we esteemed to be worthy of <​gave were inclined​> some to believe might be true. As this who was said to be their leader, had been but a few months before engaged in endeavoring to drive those, of the society, who— had settled in that vicinity, from the . This fact, had become notorious, from the fact that said had personally Ordered several of the said society to leave the . The next Morning, we dispacthed a committee to said ’s to asscertain the truth of these reports, and <​to know​> what his intentions were, and as we understood he was a peace officers, we wished to know what we might expect from him, the Committee returned, in a short time, with an unfavorable report, that instead of giving them any— assurance of preserving the peace, insulted them and gave them no satisfaction. <​being desirous to know the feelings of for myself,​> About the time the committee returned we a number of us who were <​and being​> in want of good water, and, understanding there were none nearer than s spring <​myself with several others​> Mounted our horses myself among the number and rode up to s fence, with one or two others, who had rode ahead, went into ’s house, myself and some others went to the spring for water. I was shortly after, sent for <​by ,​> and invited into the house, Being introduced to , by , invited me to take a chair <​he asked me to be seated,​> we then commenced a conversation, on the subject of the late ordeal dificulties and present exitement. I found considerable quite hostile in his feelings, towards the Mormons <​saints​>; but assured us that he did not belong to the mob, neither would he take any part with them, but said he was bound <​by his oath​> to keep support the Constitutition of the , and the Laws of the State of . Deponent then asked him, if he would make said statements in writing, so as to refute the arguments of those who had afirmed that he () was one of the leaders of the mob? answered in the affirmative, that accordingly, he did so; which writing is in the possession of the deponent.” [p. [2]]
View entire transcript

|

Cite this page

Source Note

Document Transcript

Page [2]

Document Information

Related Case Documents

 Documents Related to State of Missouri v. JS et al. for Riot

Editorial Title
Affidavit, 5 September 1838 [State of Missouri v. JS et al. for Riot]
ID #
412
Total Pages
4
Print Volume Location
JSP, D6:219–225
Handwriting on This Page
  • Elias Higbee

Footnotes

  1. [6]

    Black later indicated that on 6 August 1838, Wight and about seventeen other Latter-day Saint men visited the Black residence to discuss the violence at the Gallatin polls and “to get him [Black] to sign an obligation, binding him . . . to do them justice as justice of the peace.” Black refused, stating that “if his oath and the laws of the country did not bind him, a written obligation would be no more binding.” When Black suggested that the Saints file legal charges against those who attacked them on 6 August, Wight apparently declined, citing Missouri officials’ past failures to protect the Saints. The committee left feeling insulted, while Black felt threatened. (Robert Wilson, Gallatin, MO, to James L. Minor, Jefferson City, MO, 18 Mar. 1841, in Document Containing the Correspondence, 159–161.)

    Document Containing the Correspondence, Orders, &c., in Relation to the Disturbances with the Mormons; and the Evidence Given before the Hon. Austin A. King, Judge of the Fifth Judicial Circuit of the State of Missouri, at the Court-House in Richmond, in a Criminal Court of Inquiry, Begun November 12, 1838, on the Trial of Joseph Smith, Jr., and Others, for High Treason and Other Crimes against the State. Fayette, MO: Boon’s Lick Democrat, 1841.

  2. [7]

    Hyrum Smith later affirmed that the spring was one reason for the visit to Black’s home. (Hyrum Smith, Testimony, Nauvoo, IL, 1 July 1843, p. 2, Nauvoo, IL, Records, CHL.)

    Nauvoo, IL. Records, 1841–1845. CHL. MS 16800.

  3. [8]

    Black recalled that thirty minutes after the first committee departed, more than 150 armed Latter-day Saint men surrounded his home and “blocked up his doors.” Avard apparently entered the house first and accused Black of intending to lead a mob against the Saints. Avard allegedly threatened to kill Black if he refused to sign the agreement to uphold the law. At Black’s request, JS then entered the home to defuse the situation. Black, “seeing the situation of his family,” agreed to write a statement certifying that he would “suport the consticution of this State & of the united State[s] . . . and so long as they [the Latter-day Saints] will not mol[e]st me I will not molest them.” (Robert Wilson, Gallatin, MO, to James L. Minor, Jefferson City, MO, 18 Mar. 1841, in Document Containing the Correspondence, 161–162; Taylor, Short Account of the Murders, 2.)

    Document Containing the Correspondence, Orders, &c., in Relation to the Disturbances with the Mormons; and the Evidence Given before the Hon. Austin A. King, Judge of the Fifth Judicial Circuit of the State of Missouri, at the Court-House in Richmond, in a Criminal Court of Inquiry, Begun November 12, 1838, on the Trial of Joseph Smith, Jr., and Others, for High Treason and Other Crimes against the State. Fayette, MO: Boon’s Lick Democrat, 1841.

    Scott, Franklin William. Newspapers and Periodicals of Illinois, 1814–1879. Springfield, IL: Illinois State Historical Library, 1910.Taylor, John. A Short Account of the Murders, Roberies, Burnings, Thefts, and Other Outrages Committed by the Mob and Militia of the State of Missouri, Upon the Latter Day Saints. Springfield, IL: By the author, 1839.

© 2024 by Intellectual Reserve, Inc. All rights reserved.Terms of UseUpdated 2021-04-13Privacy NoticeUpdated 2021-04-06