Footnotes
JS, Journal, 13 Dec. 1841 and 21 Dec. 1842; Orson Spencer, “Death of Our Beloved Brother Willard Richards,” Deseret News (Salt Lake City), 16 Mar. 1854, [2].
Deseret News. Salt Lake City. 1850–.
See the full bibliographic entry for Historian’s Office, General Church Minutes, 1839–1877, in the CHL catalog.
Footnotes
Clayton, Journal, 6 Apr. 1843; see also Historical Introduction to Minutes and Discourses, 6–7 Apr. 1843.
Clayton, William. Journals, 1842–1845. CHL.
“The Ancient of Days,” Times and Seasons, 15 May 1843, 4:204; see also Daniel 7:9, 13–14.
Times and Seasons. Commerce/Nauvoo, IL. Nov. 1839–Feb. 1846.
Willard Richards recorded Pratt as saying, “I do not beleive that more than 3/4 of our bodies is composed of animal organizati[o]n. but is purely vegetable.” Franklin D. Richards quoted Pratt thus: “Only about 3/4 of the matter contained in one creature could be converted to the use of another.” (JS, Journal, 7 Apr. 1843; Richards, “Scriptural Items,” [16].)
Richards, Franklin D. Scriptural Items, ca. 1841–1844. CHL. MS 4409.
It is unclear whether Clayton’s abbreviation “s” refers to “substance” or “system.”
Orson Pratt’s argument here is similar to an argument made by his brother Parley P. Pratt in an 1841 editorial in the Millennial Star, the church’s newspaper published in England. Parley Pratt summarized some objections to a literal resurrection, conceding that “the whole matter which constitutes the physical system of the human body at any given time is said to pass away in exchange for new matter to the same amount, once in about ten years,” resulting in a given human having possessed and discarded enough matter for seven bodies after seven decades. Parley noted that matter passed from the earth, to plants, to animals, to humans, and back again, raising the possibility that “in the resurrection one individual would necessarily claim some of the same particles of matter as another, because both had once possessed some of the same particles.” Despite these contentions, he argued that it was “consciousness that constitutes the same person in reality, both in his own estimation and that of all his acquaintances” and that “even God himself, who is the standard of philosophical and all other truths, will recognise him as the same individual, and will judge him for the deeds done in the old body.” Parley concluded that Latter-day Saints had “reconciled or harmonized the revelations of God with the laws of nature.” (Parley P. Pratt, “Philosophy of the Resurrection,” Millennial Star, Nov. 1841, 2:97–100.)
Latter-day Saints’ Millennial Star. Manchester, England, 1840–1842; Liverpool, 1842–1932; London, 1932–1970.
TEXT: This last sentence may have been part of JS’s correction of Pratt, although Clayton attached it to William Smith’s discourse.
Willard Richards’s account of this meeting clarified that JS began speaking at this point. (JS, Journal, 7 Apr. 1843.)
Franklin D. Richards quoted JS as saying that “no fundamental principle of one creature can be changed to another Creature.” (Richards, “Scriptural Items,” [16].)
Richards, Franklin D. Scriptural Items, ca. 1841–1844. CHL. MS 4409.
See Malachi 3:2.