The Papers
Browse the PapersDocumentsJournalsAdministrative RecordsRevelations and TranslationsHistoriesLegal RecordsFinancial RecordsOther Contemporary Papers
Reference
PeoplePlacesEventsGlossaryLegal GlossaryFinancial GlossaryCalendar of DocumentsWorks CitedFeatured TopicsLesson PlansRelated Publications
Media
VideosPhotographsIllustrationsChartsMapsPodcasts
News
Current NewsArchiveNewsletterSubscribeJSP Conferences
About
About the ProjectJoseph Smith and His PapersFAQAwardsEndorsementsReviewsEditorial MethodNote on TranscriptionsNote on Images of People and PlacesReferencing the ProjectCiting This WebsiteProject TeamContact Us
Published Volumes
  1. Home > 
  2. The Papers > 

Sample of Pure Language, between circa 4 and circa 20 March 1832

Source Note

“A Sample of Pure Language,” [, OH, between ca. 4 and ca. 20 Mar. 1832]. Featured version copied [between 26 Apr. and ca. Aug. 1832] in Revelation Book 1, p. 144; handwriting of ; CHL. Includes redactions. For more complete source information, see the source note for Revelation Book 1.

Historical Introduction

The Book of Mormon contains an account of a people called the Jaredites who, at the time of the confounding of language at the Tower of Babel, petitioned God to keep their language pure. God complied, allowing the Jaredites to maintain their original language. Not long after the publication of the Book of Mormon, JS reviewed the book of Genesis as part of his revision of the Bible. He added a passage about Adam passing down a “book of rememberance” to his children so that they could be taught in a language “which was pure & undefiled.” By the end of March 1832, JS reviewed Revelation 3:12, which states, “Him that overcometh will I make a pillar in the temple of my God . . . and I will write upon him the name of my God” and “my new name.” This may have provoked JS’s interest in discovering the name of God in the pure language of Adam. The document below, termed a “sample” by , who copied it into Revelation Book 1 sometime after April 1832, contains information “given by Joseph the Seer” about the names of God, the Son of God, , and man in what is called a “pure language.” It also deals briefly with man’s relationship to God. Although details of its creation are scant, the document may have been related to JS’s explanation of symbolism in the book of Revelation because it is written in the same question-and-answer style as that document and immediately follows it in Revelation Book 1. Whitmer likely copied both documents into Revelation Book 1 in the same sitting.
The original manuscript is no longer extant, and ’s copy in Revelation Book 1 bears no date. That this document immediately follows the circa March 1832 explanation of the book of Revelation and immediately precedes a revelation dated 1 March 1832 suggests that the document was probably prepared sometime in March 1832. The sample itself notes that it was “copied by Br Johnson,” which likely refers to , at whose home JS was staying in March 1832. The document was apparently not well known. stated in an 1855 sermon in Salt Lake City, Utah, that the sample had “never been published” and that “this people are not generally acquainted” with it. At least some individuals, however, clearly were aware of it. , for example, included notes on the “pure language” (including some of the terms used in the sample) in an 1835 letter to his wife, . The term “Son Ah man,” meanwhile, was used in a 1 June 1833 revelation to refer to Jesus Christ, which indicates that church members were at least exposed to some of the terminology from this document.

Footnotes

  1. [1]

    Book of Mormon, 1830 ed., 539–540 [Ether 1:33–37]; Genesis 11:1–9.

  2. [2]

    Old Testament Revision 1, p. 11 [Moses 6:5–6]. This idea of a pure Edenic language continued to intrigue JS after 1830. (See Brown, “Joseph (Smith) in Egypt,” 31–35.)

    Brown, Samuel. “Joseph (Smith) in Egypt: Babel, Hieroglyphs, and the Pure Language of Eden.” Church History: Studies in Christianity and Culture 78, no. 1 (Mar. 2009): 26–65.

  3. [3]

    See Faulring et al., Joseph Smith’s New Translation of the Bible, 70.

    Faulring, Scott H., Kent P. Jackson, and Robert J. Matthews, eds. Joseph Smith’s New Translation of the Bible: Original Manuscripts. Provo, UT: Religious Studies Center, Brigham Young University, 2004.

  4. [4]

    See Answers to Questions, between ca. 4 and ca. 20 Mar. 1832 [D&C 77].

  5. [5]

    Although most of the revelations in Revelation Book 1 were entered in chronological order, some of the documents surrounding the “Sample of pure Language” were not, which raises the possibility that it was created at another time. (See Historical Introduction to Revelation Book 1.)

  6. [6]

    Except for a trip to Missouri from April to June 1832, JS stayed at the Johnson home from September 1831 to September 1832. (JS History, vol. A-1, 209–216; [Emma Smith], List, ca. 1845, in Lucy Mack Smith, History, 1844–1845, Miscellany.)

    Smith, Lucy Mack. History, 1844–1845. 18 books. CHL. MS 2049. Also available at josephsmithpapers.org.

  7. [7]

    Orson Pratt, in Journal of Discourses, 18 Feb. 1855, 2:342.

    Journal of Discourses. 26 vols. Liverpool: F. D. Richards, 1855–1886.

  8. [8]

    William W. Phelps, Kirtland, OH, to Sally Waterman Phelps, Liberty, MO, 26 May 1835, William W. Phelps, Papers, BYU.

    Phelps, William W. Papers, 1835–1865. BYU.

  9. [9]

    Revelation, 1 June 1833, in Revelation Book 2, p. 60 [D&C 95:17].

Asterisk (*) denotes a "featured" version, which includes an introduction and annotation. Sample of Pure Language, between circa 4 and circa 20 March 1832, Frederick G. Williams Copy
*Sample of Pure Language, between circa 4 and circa 20 March 1832
Revelation Book 1 Sample of Pure Language, between circa 4 and circa 20 March 1832, William W. Phelps Copy Sample of Pure Language, between circa 4 and circa 20 March 1832, as Recorded in Pratt, Notebook

Page 144

A Sample of pure Language
given by Joseph the as copied by Br Johnson
Question What is the name of God in pure Language
AnswerAwmen.
QThe meaning of the pure word A[w]men
AIt is the being which made all things in all its parts.
QWhat is the name of the Son of God.
AThe Son Awmen.
QWhat is the Son Awmen.
AIt is the greatest of all the parts of Awmen which is the Godhead the first born.
QWhat is is man.
AThis signifies Sons Awmen. the human family the children of men the greatest parts of Awmen Sons the Son Awmen
QWhat are Angels called in pure language.
AAwmen Angls-men
Q What are the meaning of these words.
AAwmen’s Ser◊◊◊ts Ministerring servants Sanctified who are sent forth from heaven to minister for or to Sons Awmen the greatest part of Awmen Son. Sons Awmen Son Awmen Awmen
[p. 144]
View entire transcript

|

Cite this page

Source Note

Document Transcript

Page 144

Document Information

Related Case Documents
Editorial Title
Sample of Pure Language, between circa 4 and circa 20 March 1832
ID #
6579
Total Pages
1
Print Volume Location
JSP, D2:213–215
Handwriting on This Page
  • John Whitmer

Footnotes

  1. [1]

    This title likely did not appear in the original manuscript; John Whitmer likely added it when he copied the document into Revelation Book 1.

  2. [2]

    TEXT: Throughout this document, “Awmen” was changed to “Awman”, either by John Whitmer at the time of inscription or later by an unidentified scribe. John Whitmer’s copy of a June 1833 revelation spells “Awmen” as “Awman.” Orson Hyde’s copy of the same revelation in Revelation Book 2 spells it “Ah Man.” These variations were standardized in the 1835 edition of the Doctrine and Covenants as “Ahman.” (Revelation, 1 June 1833, in Revelation Book 1, p. 182; Revelation Book 2, p. 60; Doctrine and Covenants 95:3, 1835 ed. [D&C 95:17].)

  3. [3]

    TEXT: Or “San”. After this point in the text, this reading is possible each time “Son” appears. Similarly, “Sans” is possible when “Sons” appears.

© 2024 by Intellectual Reserve, Inc. All rights reserved.Terms of UseUpdated 2021-04-13Privacy NoticeUpdated 2021-04-06