Charles Wetzel and Others, Answer, 21–22 November 1850 [United States v. Joseph Smith III et al.]
Source Note
Charles Wetzel, Laurenz Risse, Bernard Icking, Simon Grill, Samuel M. Chapman, and Daniel Elliott, Answer, [], Hancock Co., IL, 21–22 November 1850, U.S. v. Joseph Smith III et al. (United States Circuit Court for the District of IL 1852). Copied [ca. 17 July 1852] in Transcript of Proceedings, U.S. District Court for the District of Illinois, Complete Records, 1837–1856, vol. 4, pp. 561–574; handwriting of ; Records of District Courts of the United States, Record Group 21, National Archives at Chicago, Chicago.
But as to said South East qr. of said sec 2 6 North 9 West, they answering say:— that they have no personal knowledge of any transaction, concerning the same prior to 1850,
That they had no information Concerning the conveyances relating thereto in said bill alledged until within the last past six months, that they are now informed and believe it to be true,
That said did convey said quarter section of land to said and that said did convey all except Block 155 and a part of Block No. 156 in said to said , And that said together with said Joseph Smith did attempt to convey by their deed the same to said Joseph Smith as sole Trustee in trust for the said Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints at the times in said bill mentioned.
But these respondants know nothing of the recording or execution or of any assignment of the said Bond from the said in said bill mentioned nor have they any knowledge or information of said bond except from said Complainants’ bill:
And respondants are informed and believes and charges the facts to be, that said Joseph Smith never paid anything whatever of the consideration money for said Land or caused or procured the same to be paid and never had any equitable interest therein, but that the consideration money was wholly paid and contributed by and others members of said religious Society intending thereby to purchase the same for the sole benefit of the said and her children or them and said Religious Society.
That the said Joseph Smith was at the time and long after continued to be the sole agent and trustee of said Religious Society.
That said tract of land was laid out into town lots at the time in said bill alledged by said Smith and others while acting as such Trustee or Agent, that said Joseph Smith did as such trustee execute sundry deeds for portions of land or lots to divers persons and said Joseph Smith did together with said convey, and said after the decease of the said Joseph, did also convey sundry of said lots to divers persons,
That said Smith as such trustee or agent did to some extent as such Trustee or agent control the sale of said town lots but not otherwise.
Respondants deny that said conveyances or either or any of them were made for the purpose of hindering, delaying or defrauding the complainants or any of the creditors of the said Joseph Smith in the collection of their debts or in any fraud of the rights of the said complainants or any other person or persons.