Footnotes
See Source Note for 1834–1836 history.
JS History, 1834–1836 / Smith, Joseph, et al. History, 1834–1836. In Joseph Smith et al., History, 1838–1856, vol. A-1, back of book (earliest numbering), 9–20, 46–187. Historian's Office, History of the Church, 1839–ca. 1882. CHL. CR 100 102, box 1, vol. 1.
Of the excerpt transcribed here, manuscript pages 1–9, 18, 19, and 36 do not have a heading.
See JS History, vol. A-1, microfilm, Dec. 1971, CHL. Only one leaf of the original pastedowns and flyleaves is extant. The pastedowns were replaced with undecorated paper in 1994, according to a conservation note on the verso of the extant marbled leaf archived with the volume.
JS History, vol. A-1. Microfilm, Dec. 1971. CHL. CR 100 102, reel 1.
“Schedule of Church Records. Nauvoo 1846,” [1]; “Historian’s Office Catalogue 1858,” 2, Historian’s Office, Catalogs and Inventories, 1846–1904, CHL.
Historian’s Office. Catalogs and Inventories, 1846–1904. CHL. CR 100 130.
Footnotes
JS History / Smith, Joseph, et al. History, 1838–1856. Vols. A-1–F-1 (original), A-2–E-2 (fair copy). Historian’s Office, History of the Church, 1839–ca. 1882. CHL. CR 100 102, boxes 1–7. The history for the period after 5 Aug. 1838 was composed after the death of Joseph Smith.
Although the history was begun in 1838, it is possible that the preamble in the first paragraph was added in 1839 when James Mulholland wrote Draft 2. If so, the concern with negative publicity may also have been a reaction to the widespread news of the Mormon conflict in Missouri in fall 1838 andJS’s imprisonment, or to the growing number of publications critical of JS and the church since 1838. See, for example, Origen Bacheler, Mormonism Exposed, Internally and Externally (New York, 1838), and La Roy Sunderland’s eight-part series published in the Methodist Zion’s Watchman from 13 January to 3 March 1838 and republished in pamphlet form as Mormonism Exposed and Refuted (New York: Piercy & Reid, 1838).
The constable was Ebenezer Hatch. Although the formal charge was for being a “disorderly person,” Joseph Knight Sr. wrote that the charge was “pertending to see under ground.” One of the legal definitions of “disorderly person” was someone “pretending to tell . . . where lost or stolen goods may be found.” The charges resembled those filed earlier against JS in a court proceeding in March 1826. (Trial bill, 1 June 1830, People v. JS [J.P. Ct. 1830], Chenango County Courthouse, Norwich, NY; Ebenezer Hatch, Bill of services, 4 July 1830, Chenango County Historical Society, Norwich, NY; Knight, Reminiscences, 8; Of Disorderly Persons, Revised Statutes of the State of New-York [1827–1828], 1:638, part 1, chap. 20, title 5, sec. 1; see also Madsen, “Joseph Smith’s 1826 Trial,” 91–95.)
Trial bill, 1 June 1830. People of Chenango County, New York v. Joseph Smith (J.P. Ct. 1830). Chenango County Courthouse, Norwich, NY.
Hatch, Ebenezer. Bill of Services, 4 July 1830. Chenango County Historical Society, Norwich, NY.
Knight, Joseph, Sr. Reminiscences, no date. CHL. MS 3470.
The Revised Statutes of the State of New-York, Passed During the Years One Thousand Eight Hundred and Twenty-Seven, and One Thousand Eight Hundred and Twenty-Eight: To Which Are Added, Certain Former Acts Which Have Not Been Revised. 3 Vols. Albany: Packard and Van Benthuysen, 1829.
Madsen, Gordon A. “Joseph Smith’s 1826 Trial: The Legal Setting.” BYU Studies 30 (Spring 1990): 91–108.
It is not known whether any transcript of the South Bainbridge or Colesville trial was available to those compiling JS’s history in Illinois. The only known trial report that predates the history was published in 1832 and does not include details found here. (See “Mormonism,” Morning Star, 16 Nov. 1832, 114.)
Morning Star. Limerick, ME. 1826–1904.