The Papers
Browse the PapersDocumentsJournalsAdministrative RecordsRevelations and TranslationsHistoriesLegal RecordsFinancial RecordsOther Contemporary Papers
Reference
PeoplePlacesEventsGlossaryLegal GlossaryFinancial GlossaryCalendar of DocumentsWorks CitedFeatured TopicsLesson PlansRelated Publications
Media
VideosPhotographsIllustrationsChartsMapsPodcasts
News
Current NewsArchiveNewsletterSubscribeJSP Conferences
About
About the ProjectJoseph Smith and His PapersFAQAwardsEndorsementsReviewsEditorial MethodNote on TranscriptionsNote on Images of People and PlacesReferencing the ProjectCiting This WebsiteProject TeamContact Us
Published Volumes
  1. Home > 
  2. The Papers > 
Introduction to City of Nauvoo v. Hunter Complaint, 28 November 1842 [City of Nauvoo v. Hunter] Warrant, 28 November 1842 [City of Nauvoo v. Hunter] Complaint, 29 November 1842 [City of Nauvoo v. Hunter] Subpoena, 29 November 1842 [City of Nauvoo v. Hunter] Claim, 29 November 1842 [City of Nauvoo v. Hunter] Docket Entry, circa 29 November 1842 [City of Nauvoo v. Hunter] Supersedeas, 7 December 1842 [City of Nauvoo v. Hunter] Docket Entry, circa 29 November 1842, Copy–A [City of Nauvoo v. Hunter] Docket Entry, circa 29 November 1842, Copy–B [City of Nauvoo v. Hunter] Bond, 7 December 1842 [City of Nauvoo v. Hunter] Docket Entry, Motion, 16 May 1843 [City of Nauvoo v. Hunter] Docket Entry, Motion Sustained and Case Dismissed, 23 May 1843 [City of Nauvoo v. Hunter] Docket Entry, circa 23 May 1843 [City of Nauvoo v. Hunter] Docket Entry, Fieri Facias, between 19 September and circa 13 December 1843 [City of Nauvoo v. Hunter] Docket Entry, Fee Bill, circa 22 March 1844 [City of Nauvoo v. Hunter]

Introduction to City of Nauvoo v. Hunter

Page

City of Nauvoo v. Hunter
Nauvoo, Hancock Co., Illinois, Municipal Court, 29 November 1842
Hancock Co., Illinois, Circuit Court, 23 May 1843
 
Historical Introduction
On 28 November 1842, JS swore out a complaint before , Illinois, alderman in the Nauvoo Municipal Court, charging Thomas Hunter with maligning the church and JS’s character in violation of the city’s ordinance regarding vagrants and disorderly persons. Like most vagrancy laws, Nauvoo’s city ordinance was deliberately vague and provided wide latitude for city authorities to prosecute individuals for idleness, drunkenness, and other disorderly or suspicious behavior. According to JS’s complaint, Hunter had accused JS of being “an imposter and a swindler” on or around 26 November and stated that the church as an institution “was a swindle machine.” JS likely based his complaint on a portion of the ordinance that forbade “profane or indecent language, or behaviour.” As an alderman, Marks served as an associate justice on the municipal court and had jurisdiction over alleged breaches of city ordinances. Marks issued an arrest warrant for Hunter that same day, instructing constable to bring him before the municipal court. The next day, 29 November, Hunter was arrested and delivered into the custody of alderman , who then subpoenaed witnesses for the trial.
Following Hunter’s arrest but prior to his trial, JS swore out a second complaint before alderman , this time alleging that Hunter had violated the ’s ordinance regarding religious societies. This ordinance had been passed in March 1841 after JS, as a member of the city council, supported and helped prepare it. The ordinance guaranteed that all “religious sects and denominations whatever, shall have free toleration and equal Privilieges” in Nauvoo; it also criminalized “ridiculing[,] abusing, or otherwise depreciating another in consequence of his religion.” JS’s second complaint echoed the wording of the ordinance by accusing Hunter of using “ridiculous and abusive language” against his character.
Hunter’s trial took place on 29 November before the Municipal Court, with presiding as president pro tem. After JS’s second complaint was read to the court, Hunter pleaded guilty to violating the religious societies ordinance, and the court proceeded to hear testimony from the witnesses. The court’s docket entry states that “the Prosecutor” ultimately “recommended the Deft to the mercy of the Court.” JS’s journal for the date suggests that the prosecutor mentioned in the docket entry likely is JS, who “forgave Hunter the judgement.” The court accordingly discharged Hunter without fining him for violating a city ordinance. However, because he had pleaded guilty to the charge, the court ordered Hunter to pay the costs of the suit—amounting to eight dollars—and issued a ten-dollar fine against him for contempt of court because he had used “disrespectful and abusive language” to dismiss the authority of the municipal court.
Although Hunter had pleaded guilty, he appealed to the Circuit Court, and on 7 December 1842 the court issued a to halt the of the judgment. In February 1843, provided a certified copy of the municipal court docket entry and other documents, including JS’s original complaints, to the circuit court. In May 1843, during the circuit court’s next session, Hunter’s attorney—possibly , who had defended him before the municipal court—moved to dismiss the suit. The case was dismissed on the grounds that the municipal court lacked jurisdiction, and the was ordered to pay Hunter’s court costs. No extant records explicitly state why the circuit court believed that the municipal court lacked jurisdiction. One possibility is that while the ordinance regarding religious societies gave either the mayor’s court or municipal court original jurisdiction, the act incorporating the city of Nauvoo stated that the municipal court could act only as an appellate court and could not hear cases originally.
 
Calendar of Documents
This calendar lists all known documents created by or for the court, whether extant or not. It does not include versions of documents created for other purposes, though those versions may be listed in footnotes. In certain cases, especially in cases concerning unpaid debts, the originating document (promissory note, invoice, etc.) is listed here. Note that documents in the calendar are grouped with their originating court. Where a version of a document was subsequently filed with another court, that version is listed under both courts.
 
Nauvoo, Hancock Co., Illinois, Municipal Court

1842 (8)

November (7)

28 November 1842

JS, Complaint, before William Marks, Nauvoo, Hancock Co., IL

  • 28 Nov. 1842; JS Collection (Supplement), CHL; handwriting of James Sloan; signature of JS; certified by William Marks; docket in handwriting of James Sloan; docket and notation in handwriting of Matthias Avise.
28 November 1842

William Marks, Warrant, to Nauvoo City Marshal, for Thomas Hunter, Nauvoo, Hancock Co., IL

  • 28 Nov. 1842; BYU; handwriting of William Marks; docket in handwriting of William Marks; notation in handwriting of Dimick B. Huntington; docket and endorsement in handwriting of James Sloan; docket and notation in handwriting of M. Avise.
29 November 1842

JS, Complaint, before Daniel H. Wells, Nauvoo, Hancock Co., IL

  • 29 Nov. 1842; BYU; handwriting of George Stiles; signature of JS; certified by Daniel H. Wells; docket and notations in handwriting of James Sloan; docket and notation in handwriting of Matthias Avise.
29 November 1842

Orson Spencer, Subpoena, for George Stiles and Others, Nauvoo, Hancock Co., IL

  • 29 Nov. 1842; private possession; photocopy in Historical Department, Nineteenth-Century Legal Documents Collection, CHL; handwriting of Orson Spencer; notation and endorsement in handwriting of James Sloan.
29 November 1842

Henry G. Sherwood, Claim, Nauvoo, Hancock Co., IL

  • 29 Nov. 1842; microfilm in Circuit Court case files, 1830–1900, CHL; handwriting of Henry G. Sherwood; endorsement in handwriting of James Sloan; docket and notation in handwriting of M. Avise.
29 November 1842

Execution, Nauvoo, Hancock Co., IL

Ca. 29 November 1842

Docket Entry, Nauvoo, Hancock Co., IL

  • Ca. 29 Nov. 1842; Nauvoo Municipal Court Docket Book, 9 and 11; handwriting of James Sloan; notations in handwriting of James Sloan.
  • 5 Dec. 1842; Nauvoo Legal Proceedings, BYU; handwriting of James Sloan; docket in handwriting of James Sloan; docket and notation in handwriting of Matthias Avise.
  • 17 Feb. 1843; private possession; handwriting of James Sloan; docket in handwriting of James Sloan; docket in unidentified handwriting; notation in handwriting of Matthias Avise.

December (1)

7 December 1842

M. Avise on behalf of Jacob Davis, Supersedeas, to Nauvoo Municipal Court, Carthage, Hancock Co., IL

  • 7 Dec. 1842; microfilm in Circuit Court case files, 1830–1900, CHL; unidentified handwriting; signature of M. Avise on behalf of Jacob Davis; docket in handwriting of M. Avise; notations in handwriting of George Stigall.
 
Hancock Co., Illinois, Circuit Court

1842 (2)

November (1)

Ca. 29 November 1842

Docket Entry, Copy, Nauvoo, Hancock Co., IL

  • 5 Dec. 1842; Nauvoo, IL, Legal Proceedings, BYU; handwriting of James Sloan; docket in handwriting of James Sloan; docket and notation in handwriting of Matthias Avise.
  • 17 Feb. 1843; private possession; handwriting of James Sloan; docket in handwriting of James Sloan; docket in unidentified handwriting; notation in handwriting of Matthias Avise.

December (1)

7 December 1842

Thomas Hunter and Harmon T. Wilson, Bond, Carthage, Hancock Co., IL, to City of Nauvoo

  • 7 Dec. 1842; microfilm in Circuit Court case files, 1830–1900, CHL; printed form with manuscript additions in handwriting of M. Avise; signatures of Thomas Hunter and Harmon T. Wilson; docket and notation printed with manuscript additions in handwriting of M. Avise.

1843 (5)

May (4)

16 May 1843

Docket Entry, Motion, Carthage, Hancock Co., IL

  • 16 May 1843; Hancock County Circuit Court Record, vol. C, p. 409, Hancock County Courthouse, Carthage, IL; microfilm at FHL; handwriting of David E. Head.
23 May 1843

Docket Entry, Motion Sustained and Case Dismissed, Carthage, Hancock Co., IL

  • 23 May 1843; Hancock County Circuit Court Record, vol. C, p. 473, Hancock County Courthouse, Carthage, IL; microfilm at FHL; handwriting of David E. Head.
Ca. 23 May 1843

Docket Entry, Carthage, Hancock Co., IL

  • Ca. 23 May 1843; Hancock County Circuit Court, Judgment Docket, vol. B, p. 22, Hancock County Courthouse, Carthage, IL; image in Hancock County Papers, 1830–1872, CHL; unidentified handwriting.
Ca. 23 May 1843

Docket Entry, Fee Bill, Carthage, Hancock Co., IL

December (1)

Between 19 September and ca. 13 December 1843

Docket Entry, Fieri Facias, Carthage, Hancock Co., IL

  • Between 19 Sept. and ca. 13 Dec. 1843; Hancock County Circuit Court, Execution Docket, vol. B, p. [97], Hancock County Courthouse, Carthage, IL; image in Hancock County Papers, 1830–1872, CHL; handwriting of David E. Head.

1844 (2)

March (2)

22 March 1844

Fee Bill, Carthage Hancock Co., IL

Ca. 22 March 1844

Docket Entry, Fee Bill, Carthage, Hancock Co., IL

  • Ca. 22 March 1844; Hancock County Circuit Court, Execution Docket, vol. B, p. [137], Hancock County Courthouse, Carthage, IL; image in Hancock County Papers, 1830–1872, CHL; handwriting of David E. Head.
View entire transcript

|

Cite this page

Source Note

Document Transcript

Page

Document Information

Related Case Documents
Editorial Title
Introduction to City of Nauvoo v. Hunter
ID #
15842
Total Pages
1
Print Volume Location
Handwriting on This Page

    Footnotes

    1. [1]

      Complaint, 28 Nov. 1842 [City of Nauvoo v. Hunter].

    2. [2]

      These ordinances also supplied a legal means to threaten and prosecute destitute or undesirable residents when it was deemed in the public interest. (Nauvoo City Council Minute Book, 13 Nov. 1841, 31; see also Ocobock, “Vagrancy and Homelessness in Global and Historical Perspective,” 1–34.)

      Ocobock, Paul. “Vagrancy and Homelessness in Global and Historical Perspective.” In Cast Out: Vagrancy and Homelessness in Global and Historical Perspective, edited by A. L. Beier and Paul Ocobock, 1–34. Athens, OH: Ohio University Press, 2008.

    3. [3]

      Complaint, 28 Nov. 1842 [City of Nauvoo v. Hunter].

    4. [4]

      Nauvoo City Council Minute Book, 13 Nov. 1841, 31.

    5. [5]

      Act to Incorporate the City of Nauvoo, 16 Dec. 1840.

    6. [6]

      See Warrant, 28 Nov. 1842 [City of Nauvoo v. Hunter]; and Subpoena, 29 Nov. 1842 [City of Nauvoo v. Hunter].

    7. [7]

      See Complaint, 29 Nov. 1842 [City of Nauvoo v. Hunter]; and Nauvoo City Council Minute Book, 1 Mar. 1841, 13. JS’s second complaint against Hunter was one of two complaints he swore out before Wells on 29 November regarding violations of this ordinance; the other complaint accused Amos Davis. (See Complaint, 29 Nov. 1842 [City of Nauvoo v. Davis for Slander of JS–B].)

    8. [8]

      Nauvoo City Council Minute Book, 1 Mar. 1841, 13.

    9. [9]

      Complaint, 29 Nov. 1842 [City of Nauvoo v. Hunter]; Nauvoo City Council Minute Book, 1 Mar. 1841, 13.

    10. [10]

      In addition to Wells, the court consisted of aldermen Newel K. Whitney, George W. Harris, Gustavus Hills, and William Marks. (See Docket Entry, ca. 29 Nov. 1842 [City of Nauvoo v. Hunter]; and JS, Journal, 29 Nov. 1842.)

    11. [11]

      See Docket Entry, ca. 29 Nov. 1842 [City of Nauvoo v. Hunter]. The state statute relating to guilty pleas instructed courts that “in all cases where the court possess any discretion as to the extent of the punishment, it shall be the duty of the court to examine witnesses as to the aggravation and mitigation of the offence.” (An Act relative to Criminal Jurisprudence [26 Feb. 1833], Public and General Statute Laws of the State of Illinois, p. 232, sec. 173.)

      The Public and General Statute Laws of the State of Illinois: Containing All the Laws . . . Passed by the Ninth General Assembly, at Their First Session, Commencing December 1, 1834, and Ending February 13, 1835; and at Their Second Session, Commencing December 7, 1835, and Ending January 18, 1836; and Those Passed by the Tenth General Assembly, at Their Session Commencing December 5, 1836, and Ending March 6, 1837; and at Their Special Session, Commencing July 10, and Ending July 22, 1837. . . . Compiled by Jonathan Young Scammon. Chicago: Stephen F. Gale, 1839.

    12. [12]

      Docket Entry, ca. 29 Nov. 1842 [City of Nauvoo v. Hunter]; JS, Journal, 29 Nov. 1842. The ordinance regarding religious societies allowed for fines “in any Sum not exceeding five hundred Dollars” or for imprisonment “not exceeding six months, or both.” (Nauvoo City Council Minute Book, 1 Mar. 1841, 13.)

    13. [13]

      Docket Entry, ca. 29 Nov. 1842 [City of Nauvoo v. Hunter]. This fine was a violation of state law, which allowed justices of the peace to issue fines of no “more than five dollars” for contempt of court. (An Act concerning Justices of the Peace and Constables [3 Feb. 1827], Public and General Statute Laws of the State of Illinois, 408, sec. 24.)

      The Public and General Statute Laws of the State of Illinois: Containing All the Laws . . . Passed by the Ninth General Assembly, at Their First Session, Commencing December 1, 1834, and Ending February 13, 1835; and at Their Second Session, Commencing December 7, 1835, and Ending January 18, 1836; and Those Passed by the Tenth General Assembly, at Their Session Commencing December 5, 1836, and Ending March 6, 1837; and at Their Special Session, Commencing July 10, and Ending July 22, 1837. . . . Compiled by Jonathan Young Scammon. Chicago: Stephen F. Gale, 1839.

    14. [14]

      See Supersedeas, 7 Dec. 1842 [City of Nauvoo v. Hunter]; and Docket Entry, ca. 29 Nov. 1842 [City of Nauvoo v. Hunter].

    15. [15]

      See Docket Entry, ca. 29 Nov. 1842 [City of Nauvoo v. Hunter]; Docket Entry, Motion, 16 May 1843 [City of Nauvoo v. Hunter]; Docket Entry, Motion Sustained and Case Dismissed, 23 May 1843 [City of Nauvoo v. Hunter]; Nauvoo City Council Minute Book, 1 Mar. 1841, 13; and Act to Incorporate the City of Nauvoo, 16 Dec. 1840. The same day it dismissed the municipal court’s case against Hunter, the Hancock County Circuit Court also dismissed one of JS’s complaints against Amos Davis that was tried under similar circumstances. (See Docket Entry, Dismissal, 23 May 1843 [City of Nauvoo v. Davis for Slander of JS–C]; and Introduction to City of Nauvoo v. Davis for Slander of JS–B and City of Nauvoo v. Davis for Slander of JS–.)

    © 2024 by Intellectual Reserve, Inc. All rights reserved.Terms of UseUpdated 2021-04-13Privacy NoticeUpdated 2021-04-06