Page
Page
Docket Entry, 18–19 Sept. 1843 [Niswanger v. Wight and Jett]; An Act concerning Justices of the Peace and Constables [3 Feb. 1827], Public and General Statute Laws of the State of Illinois [1834–1837], p. 402, sec. 1. The specific common law action Niswanger used is unknown. The figure of $79.84 comes from a notation on the promissory note and is included in Isaac Higbee’s docket entry for the case. It is unclear how Niswanger arrived at this figure. (Promissory Note, 5 Apr. 1842 [Niswanger v. Wight and Jett].)
The Public and General Statute Laws of the State of Illinois: Containing All the Laws . . . Passed by the Ninth General Assembly, at Their First Session, Commencing December 1, 1834, and Ending February 13, 1835; and at Their Second Session, Commencing December 7, 1835, and Ending January 18, 1836; and Those Passed by the Tenth General Assembly, at Their Session Commencing December 5, 1836, and Ending March 6, 1837; and at Their Special Session, Commencing July 10, and Ending July 22, 1837. . . . Compiled by Jonathan Young Scammon. Chicago: Stephen F. Gale, 1839.
JS, Journal, 21 July 1843; Docket Entry, 18–19 Sept. 1843 [Niswanger v. Wight and Jett]. Illinois law allowed the justice of the peace to proceed against the party that was served with notice and to determine a judgment. (An Act concerning Justices of the Peace and Constables [3 Feb. 1827], Public and General Statute Laws of the State of Illinois [1834–1837], pp. 404–405, sec. 7.)
The Public and General Statute Laws of the State of Illinois: Containing All the Laws . . . Passed by the Ninth General Assembly, at Their First Session, Commencing December 1, 1834, and Ending February 13, 1835; and at Their Second Session, Commencing December 7, 1835, and Ending January 18, 1836; and Those Passed by the Tenth General Assembly, at Their Session Commencing December 5, 1836, and Ending March 6, 1837; and at Their Special Session, Commencing July 10, and Ending July 22, 1837. . . . Compiled by Jonathan Young Scammon. Chicago: Stephen F. Gale, 1839.
Higbee’s docket entry simply stated, “By oath of defendant before R D Foster Esq. cause of action brought before me.” Illinois law provided that a defendant, upon his oath that he believed he could not obtain an impartial trial, could have the proceedings transferred to the nearest justice of the peace. (Docket Entry, 18–19 Sept. 1843 [Niswanger v. Wight and Jett]; An Act concerning Justices of the Peace and Constables [3 Feb. 1827], Public and General Statute Laws of the State of Illinois [1834–1837], p. 408, sec. 25.)
The Public and General Statute Laws of the State of Illinois: Containing All the Laws . . . Passed by the Ninth General Assembly, at Their First Session, Commencing December 1, 1834, and Ending February 13, 1835; and at Their Second Session, Commencing December 7, 1835, and Ending January 18, 1836; and Those Passed by the Tenth General Assembly, at Their Session Commencing December 5, 1836, and Ending March 6, 1837; and at Their Special Session, Commencing July 10, and Ending July 22, 1837. . . . Compiled by Jonathan Young Scammon. Chicago: Stephen F. Gale, 1839.
Docket Entry, 18–19 Sept. 1843 [Niswanger v. Wight and Jett]. According to Higbee’s list of costs associated with the case, Hewit and Zundel were entitled to compensation for attending two days of trial, yet JS was not. JS’s journal makes no mention of JS attending the trial, and William Clayton’s journal states that JS and Emma Smith “rode to Woolleys” that day, presumably a reference to Edwin Woolley and family, who owned a farm about two miles east of Nauvoo. (JS, Journal, 19 Sept. 1843; Clayton, Journal, 19 Sept. 1843; Robert Peirce and Hannah Peirce, Deed to Edwin D. Woolley, 12 Aug. 1842, in Nauvoo Registry of Deeds, Record of Deeds, bk. B, p. 298.)
Clayton, William. Journals, 1842–1845. CHL.
Nauvoo Registry of Deeds. Record of Deeds, bk. B, 1843–1846. CHL. MS 3443.
Subpoena, 20 May 1844 [Niswanger v. Wight and Jett]. JS’s journal indicated that although he was at home on 22 May 1844, he was avoiding Backenstos, who was attempting to serve a summons on him for a separate suit initiated by church dissident Francis M. Higbee. (JS, Journal, 22 May 1844.)
Docket Entry, Judgment, 23 May 1844 [Niswanger v. Wight and Jett]. Two days before the hearing, Wight left Nauvoo on the steamship Osprey for St. Louis, Missouri. (JS, Journal, 21 May 1844.)
© 2024 by Intellectual Reserve, Inc. All rights reserved.Terms of UseUpdated 2021-04-13Privacy NoticeUpdated 2021-04-06