relation to the deed in said bill mentioned from Joseph Smith and to said Joseph Smith as sole trustee in trust for the said Church of Jesus Christ of Latter day Saints.
That before the time of the making of the same the said Church was a religious unincorporated Society but had then become a corporation under the laws of the State of .
That said then held the title to said quarter section of land in her own right, and to some extent in trust for said religious Society but to what extent these respondants are uninformed.
That said conveyance was made in execution of such trust to said Joseph Smith as the head and sole Trustee of said corporation, and for no fraudulent purpose whatever.
That conveyances by him as sole Trustee afterward were made in good faith for valuable consideration paid by the purchaser in execution of said trust.
That these facts Respondants have learned and been informed of, wholly since the purchase in these this their answer mentioned and set forth and before which they had no knowledge thereof.
And that their purchases were made in good faith and for valuable considerations paid at the several terms terms thereof by these Respondants, and without the knowledge of any fraud or trusts other than shewn by said deeds,
These Respondants do not know but require proof that said at the time of his death was insolvent.
That said , and were insolvent as in said bill alledged or either of them, nor have they any knowledge nor can they state from their belief or otherwise as to their residence.
And this Respondant further answering as to Interrogatory No. 3 says:
That they do not know and cannot state from his belief or otherwise whether the said Joseph Smith died seized of all or any of the premises in the Complainant’s bill described except so far as herein before stated.
And for answer to Interrogatory No 4 say
That they have no personal knowledge of the appointment of said administratrix of the Estate of the said Joseph Smith deceased, nor of the appointment of the said , nor of the revocation of the said letters of administration, nor of the appointment of the said John M. Ferris administrator D. B. N., but are informed of the same and therefore admit the same to be true as in said bill is alledged. [p. 531]