The seperate answer of defendant Luke P. Prentice to the complainants’ bill filed herein
And the said Luke P. Prentice saving and reserving to himself all and all manner of exceptions to the many uncertainties, informalities and insufficiencies in complainants’ bill for answer thereto or to so much thereof as he is advised it is necessary for him to answer says.
That he is the owner in fact of the fee simple title of lots No 2 on Block 160 and lot one (1) in Block 121 lot 3 Block 3, in Block 138 in the City of according the plat of said in the said complainants’ bill mentioned.
Respondant, further denies, that said Smith ever had any interest either in law or in equity to the said lots or that [p. 600]