Footnotes
This serialized history drew on the journals herein beginning with the 4 July 1855 issue of the Deseret News and with the 3 January 1857 issue of the LDS Millennial Star.
The labels on the spines of the four volumes read respectively as follows: “Joseph Smith’s Journal—1842–3 by Willard Richards” (book 1); “Joseph Smith’s Journal by W. Richards 1843” (book 2); “Joseph Smith’s Journal by W. Richards 1843–4” (book 3); and “W. Richards’ Journal 1844 Vol. 4” (book 4). Richards kept JS’s journal in the front of book 4, and after JS’s death Richards kept his own journal in the back of the volume.
“Schedule of Church Records, Nauvoo 1846,” [1], Historian’s Office, Catalogs and Inventories, 1846–1904, CHL.
Historian’s Office. Catalogs and Inventories, 1846–1904. CHL. CR 100 130.
“Inventory. Historian’s Office. 4th April 1855,” [1]; “Contents of the Historian and Recorder’s Office G. S. L. City July 1858,” 2; “Index of Records and Journals in the Historian’s Office 1878,” [11]–[12], Historian’s Office, Catalogs and Inventories, 1846–1904, CHL; Johnson, Register of the Joseph Smith Collection, 7.
Historian’s Office. Catalogs and Inventories, 1846–1904. CHL. CR 100 130.
Johnson, Jeffery O. Register of the Joseph Smith Collection in the Church Archives, the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. Salt Lake City: Historical Department of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, 1973.
Footnotes
Historical Introduction to JS, Journal, Dec. 1841–Dec. 1842.
Source Note to JS, Journal, 1835–1836; Source Note to JS, Journal, Mar.–Sept. 1838.
See Appendix 3.
TEXT: “th” is double underlined.
JS scheduled the meeting of the Council of Fifty for later in the day, at two o’clock. As standing chairman, JS called the meeting to discuss letters, which reported on council business, that had just arrived from Orson Hyde in Washington DC. (Council of Fifty, “Record,” 13 May 1844.)
Hyde left Nauvoo for Washington DC on 4 April 1844 with memorials, petitioning for a congressional act or presidential grant of authority that would make JS a member of the United States Army and authorize him to raise one hundred thousand armed volunteers to protect the interests of the United States in Texas, Oregon, and other parts of the West. In his letters to JS, Hyde recounted his discussions about the memorials with Stephen A. Douglas, Illinois senator James Semple, and various congressmen from Illinois. All agreed that it would be “extremely difficult to have any bill pass in relation to the encouragement of emigration to Oregon” in the current political and international climate and that it would be “much more difficult to get a bill passed designating any particular man to go.” A further difficulty with the Mormons’ proposed bill, according to Semple, was the request that Congress make JS a member of the army. “Mr. Smith could not constitutionally be constituted a member of the Army by law,” Semple told Hyde, “and this, if nothing else would prevent its passage.” Hyde told Semple that he would, “in that case, strike out that clause,” even though JS had earlier charged Hyde “not to suffer any part of the memorial to be stricken out, but if Congress will not pass it in its pure original State, let them reject it.” Hyde defended his action to JS on the grounds that he could “do no better than act according to what appears most correct.” (JS, Journal, 25 and 31 Mar. 1844; 4 Apr. 1844; Council of Fifty, “Record,” 21 Mar. 1844; Orson Hyde, Washington DC, to JS, Nauvoo, IL, 25 Apr. 1844; Orson Hyde, Washington DC, to JS, Nauvoo, IL, 26 Apr. 1844, JS Collection, CHL.)
According to the minutes of the council, William W. Phelps was appointed to draft the letter. The regular clerk of the council, William Clayton, had left Nauvoo on 2 May for Dixon. He returned on the Maid of Iowa shortly after this meeting adjourned. (Council of Fifty, “Record,” 13 May 1844; JS, Journal, 2 May 1844; Clayton, Journal, 13 May 1844.)
Clayton, William. Journals, 1842–1845. CHL.
According to the minutes, the council adjourned at four thirty in the afternoon. (Council of Fifty, “Record,” 13 May 1844.)
The council’s discussion focused on Hyde’s willingness to alter the bill he was intending to submit to Congress. Council members objected to altering the memorial and voted to instruct Hyde and Pratt—the council’s “delegates” in Washington DC—“to carry all Memorials through Congress without alteration.” In his letter, written “by order of the Council,” Richards instructed Hyde and Pratt that Wight and Kimball were to assist them in Washington DC and expressed the council’s disapproval of Hyde’s proposal to change the memorial. Richards also asserted that Congress did have “the right and the power” to grant the memorial and that Congress needed to “learn that the people are the sovereigns and Congress as their servant is bound to obey.” Wight and Kimball left Nauvoo with the letter on 21 May 1844 and presented it to Hyde in Washington DC on 8 June 1844. (Council of Fifty, “Record,” 13 May 1844; Letter to Orson Hyde and Orson Pratt, 13 May 1844; JS, Journal, 16 and 21 May 1844; Orson Hyde, Washington DC, to JS et al., Nauvoo, IL, 9 June 1844, JS Collection, CHL.)
William Clayton, Alpheus Cutler, Stephen Markham, and others left Nauvoo for Dixon on the Maid of Iowa on 2 May. Though the main purpose of the trip was to purchase corn (probably to be used to pay temple workers), the three men also attended the Lee County Circuit Court trial of JS v. Harmon T. Wilson and Joseph H. Reynolds. (JS, Journal, 2 May 1844; Clayton, Journal, 5 and 10 May 1844.)
Clayton, William. Journals, 1842–1845. CHL.