Footnotes
This serialized history drew on the journals herein beginning with the 4 July 1855 issue of the Deseret News and with the 3 January 1857 issue of the LDS Millennial Star.
The labels on the spines of the four volumes read respectively as follows: “Joseph Smith’s Journal—1842–3 by Willard Richards” (book 1); “Joseph Smith’s Journal by W. Richards 1843” (book 2); “Joseph Smith’s Journal by W. Richards 1843–4” (book 3); and “W. Richards’ Journal 1844 Vol. 4” (book 4). Richards kept JS’s journal in the front of book 4, and after JS’s death Richards kept his own journal in the back of the volume.
“Schedule of Church Records, Nauvoo 1846,” [1], Historian’s Office, Catalogs and Inventories, 1846–1904, CHL.
Historian’s Office. Catalogs and Inventories, 1846–1904. CHL. CR 100 130.
“Inventory. Historian’s Office. 4th April 1855,” [1]; “Contents of the Historian and Recorder’s Office G. S. L. City July 1858,” 2; “Index of Records and Journals in the Historian’s Office 1878,” [11]–[12], Historian’s Office, Catalogs and Inventories, 1846–1904, CHL; Johnson, Register of the Joseph Smith Collection, 7.
Historian’s Office. Catalogs and Inventories, 1846–1904. CHL. CR 100 130.
Johnson, Jeffery O. Register of the Joseph Smith Collection in the Church Archives, the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. Salt Lake City: Historical Department of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, 1973.
Footnotes
Historical Introduction to JS, Journal, Dec. 1841–Dec. 1842.
Source Note to JS, Journal, 1835–1836; Source Note to JS, Journal, Mar.–Sept. 1838.
See Appendix 3.
Joseph W. Coolidge and David S. Hollister were admitted as the fiftieth and fifty-first members of the Council of Fifty in this meeting, after which JS said that the council was full. According to William Clayton, however, before JS declared the council full, he also added Lyman Wight (who was at the church’s lumber operation in Wisconsin Territory), bringing the total number of men in the council to fifty-two. At this meeting, William W. Phelps read JS’s response to Francis Blair (which had been published in the Nauvoo Neighbor the previous day) and Richards read an incomplete draft of the constitution that he, John Taylor, Phelps, and Parley P. Pratt had been appointed to write. The constitution noted that God was the only legitimate lawgiver and that he appointed one man, a prophet, to whom he would reveal his laws. The prophet, in turn, had power to appoint “Judges and officers” who could be accepted or refused by the people. Following the reading, John Taylor expressed to the council that writing the constitution was difficult for the committee and opined that it would be written correctly only if God revealed its content to them. The council granted the committee more time to write. (Council of Fifty, “Record,” 18 Apr. 1844; Clayton, Journal, 18 Apr. 1844.)
Clayton, William. Journals, 1842–1845. CHL.
In this afternoon meeting of the Council of Fifty, council members discussed the differences between the “Kingdom of God” and the church. The discussion ended with JS saying that the two were separate: the church was a “spiritual matter and a spiritual kingdom,” and the Kingdom of God was an entity to protect the Saints’ religious rights. JS closed his remarks by saying that the only problem with the Constitution of the United States was that it needed to be altered “so as to make it imperative on the officers to enforce the protection of all men in their rights.” The council adjourned to 25 April. (Council of Fifty, “Record,” 18 Apr. 1844.)
Robert D. Foster had been charged by JS with unchristian conduct five days earlier. At this meeting, evidence was presented that Foster had warned people not to purchase land from JS and that he had accused JS of murder, counterfeiting, and adultery.a In January 1844, JS accused the Laws of “injuring him” by telling falsehoods about him; about the same time, William Law was dropped from the First Presidency and the group that met to discuss and participate in temple-related ordinances. Additionally, both William and Wilson Law were reportedly involved in a conspiracy with Foster and others to kill JS and his family. Evidence indicates that the Laws felt animosity toward JS because they opposed plural marriage. JS also refused to seal William and Jane Silverthorn Law because William was an “adulterous person.” In addition, Jane accused JS of wanting her as a plural wife and attempting to seduce her. JS denied Jane’s accusation, reporting that she had suggested she be sealed to him after he had refused to seal her to her husband.b
(aJS, Journal, 24 Mar. and 13 Apr. 1844; Quorum of the Twelve Apostles, Minutes, 18 Apr. 1844. bJS, Journal, 8 Jan. and 24 Mar. 1844; Law, Record of Doings, 1 and 8 Jan. 1844, in Cook, William Law, 38, 46; Quorum of the Twelve Apostles, Minutes, 18 Apr. 1844; Clayton, Journal, 12 June 1844; Neibaur, Journal, 24 May 1844; see also Council of Fifty, “Record,” 278–280.)Quorum of the Twelve Apostles. Minutes, 1840–1844. CHL.
Cook, Lyndon W. William Law: Biographical Essay, Nauvoo Diary, Correspondence, Interview. Orem, UT: Grandin Book, 1994.
Clayton, William. Journals, 1842–1845. CHL.
Neibaur, Alexander. Journal, 1841–1862. CHL. MS 1674.